Linux-PCI Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: pciehp: bail out if pci_hp_add_bridge() fails
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240504154806.zpZEo__F@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjZOCj4Cxizsj3iY@wunner.de>

On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 11:51:54AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Could you reproduce with pciehp instead of shpchp please?
> > 
> > Same thing for pciehp below. I think the problem is because without 
> > pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(), no one cleans up the device added in
> > pci_scan_slot(). When another device get hot-added, pci_get_slot() wrongly
> > thinks another device is already there, so the hot-plug fails.
> 
> pciehp powers down the slot because you're returning a negative errno
> from pciehp_configure_device().  Please return 0 instead if
> pci_hp_add_bridge() fails.

Thanks for the suggestion. This is applicable to shpchp as well.

Best regards,
Nam

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-04 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 19:23 [PATCH 0/4] check returned value of pci_hp_add_bridge() Nam Cao
2024-05-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: shpchp: bail out if pci_hp_add_bridge() fails Nam Cao
2024-05-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: pciehp: " Nam Cao
2024-05-03 21:23   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-03 21:41     ` Nam Cao
2024-05-04  8:54   ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-04  9:35     ` Nam Cao
2024-05-04  9:51       ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-04 10:56         ` Nam Cao
2024-05-04 15:02           ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-04 15:48             ` Nam Cao [this message]
2024-05-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: hotplug: document unchecked return value of pci_hp_add_bridge() Nam Cao
2024-05-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: hotplug: remove TODO notes for sgi_hotplug Nam Cao
2024-05-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] check returned value of pci_hp_add_bridge() Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240504154806.zpZEo__F@linutronix.de \
    --to=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).