Linux-rt-users archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] rt-tests: hackbench: drop incorrect and unnecessary usage of optind
Date: Tue,  2 Apr 2024 19:46:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402174659.202695-1-namcao@linutronix.de> (raw)

Variable "optind" is used as the last argument of getopt_long(). This
means it "is set to the index of the long option relative to longopts"
(from man page). NULL check is then performed on argv[optind], which is
not valid, because in this case, optind is not an index to argv[].

There is another "optind" which is a global variable, which actually
holds the index to argv[]. This is likely the actual intention here. By
locally define another "optind", the "real optind" is shadowed in this
scope.

Furthermore, the original optind "is the index of the next element to
be processed in argv" (from man page), not the index to the current
element. So doing NULL-check on argv[optind] with the "original optind"
is also not valid.

There is no reason to do this NULL-check, since argv[optind] is not even
read. Only optarg is read, which is never a NULL pointer in this case.

Delete this incorrect and unnecessary "optind".

Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
---
 src/hackbench/hackbench.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/hackbench/hackbench.c b/src/hackbench/hackbench.c
index 4430db0..d4924b3 100644
--- a/src/hackbench/hackbench.c
+++ b/src/hackbench/hackbench.c
@@ -405,8 +405,6 @@ static unsigned int group(childinfo_t *child,
 static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	for(;;) {
-		int optind = 0;
-
 		static struct option longopts[] = {
 			{"fds",		required_argument,	NULL, 'f'},
 			{"fifo",	no_argument,		NULL, 'F'},
@@ -422,13 +420,13 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
 		};
 
 		int c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "f:Fg:hl:pis:TP",
-				    longopts, &optind);
+				    longopts, NULL);
 		if (c == -1) {
 			break;
 		}
 		switch (c) {
 		case 'f':
-			if (!(argv[optind] && (num_fds = atoi(optarg)) > 0)) {
+			if ((num_fds = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
 				fprintf(stderr, "%s: --fds|-f requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
 				print_usage_exit(1);
 			}
@@ -437,7 +435,7 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
 			fifo = 1;
 			break;
 		case 'g':
-			if (!(argv[optind] && (num_groups = atoi(optarg)) > 0)) {
+			if ((num_groups = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
 				fprintf(stderr, "%s: --groups|-g requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
 				print_usage_exit(1);
 			}
@@ -446,7 +444,7 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
 			print_usage_exit(0);
 			break;
 		case 'l':
-			if (!(argv[optind] && (loops = atoi(optarg)) > 0)) {
+			if ((loops = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
 				fprintf(stderr, "%s: --loops|-l requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
 				print_usage_exit(1);
 			}
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 17:46 Nam Cao [this message]
2024-04-05  8:52 ` [PATCH] rt-tests: hackbench: drop incorrect and unnecessary usage of optind Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-05 21:24   ` John Kacur
2024-04-05 21:22 ` John Kacur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240402174659.202695-1-namcao@linutronix.de \
    --to=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).