Linux-Security-Module Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] security: fix the logic in security_inode_getsecctx()
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:44:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126104403.1040692-1-omosnace@redhat.com> (raw)

The inode_getsecctx LSM hook has previously been corrected to have
-EOPNOTSUPP instead of 0 as the default return value to fix BPF LSM
behavior. However, the call_int_hook()-generated loop in
security_inode_getsecctx() was left treating 0 as the neutral value, so
after an LSM returns 0, the loop continues to try other LSMs, and if one
of them returns a non-zero value, the function immediately returns with
said value. So in a situation where SELinux and the BPF LSMs registered
this hook, -EOPNOTSUPP would be incorrectly returned whenever SELinux
returned 0.

Fix this by open-coding the call_int_hook() loop and making it use the
correct LSM_RET_DEFAULT() value as the neutral one, similar to what
other hooks do.

Reported-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAEjxPJ4ev-pasUwGx48fDhnmjBnq_Wh90jYPwRQRAqXxmOKD4Q@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: b36995b8609a ("lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx")
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
---

I ran 'tools/nfs.sh' on the patch and even though it fixes the most
serious issue that Stephen reported, some of the tests are still
failing under NFS (but I will presume that these are pre-existing issues
not caused by the patch).

I can also see an opportunity to clean up the hook implementations in
security/security.c - I plan to have a go at it and send it as a
separate patch later.

 security/security.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 0144a98d3712..6196ccaba433 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -4255,7 +4255,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_setsecctx);
  */
 int security_inode_getsecctx(struct inode *inode, void **ctx, u32 *ctxlen)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(inode_getsecctx, -EOPNOTSUPP, inode, ctx, ctxlen);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc;
+
+	/*
+	 * Only one module will provide a security context.
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_getsecctx, list) {
+		rc = hp->hook.inode_getsecctx(inode, ctx, ctxlen);
+		if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_getsecctx))
+			return rc;
+	}
+
+	return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_getsecctx);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_getsecctx);
 
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26 10:44 Ondrej Mosnacek [this message]
2024-01-26 14:32 ` [PATCH] security: fix the logic in security_inode_getsecctx() Ondrej Mosnacek
2024-01-26 15:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2024-01-26 16:04   ` Stephen Smalley
2024-01-26 17:15     ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2024-01-29 19:48       ` Stephen Smalley
2024-01-29 21:55         ` Paul Moore
2024-01-30 15:44           ` Stephen Smalley
2024-01-30 16:31             ` Paul Moore
2024-01-26 16:36 ` Casey Schaufler
2024-01-26 22:18 ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240126104403.1040692-1-omosnace@redhat.com \
    --to=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).