LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
Subject: Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:07:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454584036.3407.121.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602041130380.25254@nanos>

On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 11:46 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > I'm also wondering why 22b886dd only applies to kernels >= 4.2.
> > 
> > 
> > Regardless of the previous CPU a timer was on, add_timer_on()
> > currently simply sets timer->flags to the new CPU.  As the caller must
> > be seeing the timer as idle, this is locally fine, but the timer
> > leaving the old base while unlocked can lead to race conditions as
> > follows.
> > 
> > Let's say timer was on cpu 0.
> > 
> >   cpu 0                                 cpu 1
> >   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >   del_timer(timer) succeeds
> >                                         del_timer(timer)
> >                                           lock_timer_base(timer) locks cpu_0_base
> >   add_timer_on(timer, 1)
> >     spin_lock(&cpu_1_base->lock)
> >     timer->flags set to cpu_1_base
> >     operates on @timer                    operates on @timer
> > 
> > 
> > What's the difference between...
> >      timer->flags = (timer->flags & ~TIMER_BASEMASK) | cpu;
> > and...
> >      timer_set_base(timer, base);
> > 
> > ...that makes that fix unneeded prior to 4.2?  We take the same locks
> > in < 4.2 kernels, so seemingly both will diddle concurrently above.
> 
> Indeed, you are right.

Whew, thanks for confirming, looking for what the hell I was missing
wasn't going well at all, ate most of my day.

> The same can happen on pre 4.2, just the fix does not apply as we changed the
> internals how the base is managed in the timer itself. Backport below.

Exactly what I did locally.

	-Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 21:19 Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25 Jan Kara
2016-01-20 21:39 ` Shaohua Li
2016-01-21  9:52   ` Jan Kara
2016-01-21 13:29     ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-22  1:10     ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-22 16:09       ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-23  2:20         ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-23 16:11           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26  9:34             ` Jan Kara
2016-01-26  9:49               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26 11:14               ` Petr Mladek
2016-01-26 13:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03  9:35                   ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-03 10:41                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 12:28                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 16:24                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 16:48                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 16:59                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-04  6:37                             ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04  7:40                               ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 17:01                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 17:06                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 17:13                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 17:15                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-04  2:00                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 16:49                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05 20:47                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 20:54                                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05 20:59                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 21:06                                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-06 13:07                                         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-02-07  5:19                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-07  5:59                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 15:31                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 16:39                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-09 16:50                                             ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:04                                               ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 17:54                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:56                                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 18:02                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 18:27                                                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:04                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-09 17:51                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 18:06                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-04 10:04                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-04 10:46                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-04 11:07                                 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2016-02-04 11:20                                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 16:39                                   ` Daniel Bilik
2016-02-05  2:40                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05  8:11                                       ` Daniel Bilik
2016-02-05  8:33                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 18:46                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 19:01                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 19:05                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 19:15                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05  5:44                         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454584036.3407.121.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).