LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:11:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160205091146.d25db60f5c68229056aad82f@neosystem.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454640046.3545.8.camel@gmail.com>

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:40:46 +0100
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 17:39 +0100, Daniel Bilik wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:20:44 +0100
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks for backport Thomas and to Mike for persistence :). I've
> > > asked my friend seeing crashes with 3.18.25 to try whether this
> > > patch fixes the issues. It may take some time so stay tuned...
> > 
> > Patch tested and it really fixes the crash we were experiencing on
> > 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+. But it seem to introduce (rather scary)
> > regression. Tested host shows abnormal cpu usage in both kernel and
> > userland under the same load and traffic pattern. One picture is worth
> > a thousand words, so I've taken snapshots of our graphs, see here:
> > http://neosystem.cz/test/linux-3.18.25/
> > The host was running 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+ (1e7af29+ on
> > 3.18-stable) reverted. With this commit included, it crashed within
> > minutes. Around 13:30 we booted 3.18.25 with commit 874bbfe+ included
> > and with the patch from Thomas. And around 15:40 we've booted the host
> > with previous kernel, just to ensure this abnormal behaviour was
> > really caused by the test kernel.
> > Also interesting, in addition to high cpu usage, there is abnormally
> > high number of zombie processes reported by the system.
> 
> IMHO you should restore the CC list and re-post.  (If I were the
> maintainer of either the workqueue code or 3.18-stable, I'd be highly
> interested in this finding).

Sorry, I haven't realized tha patch proposed by Thomas is already on its
way to stable. CC restored and re-posting.

--
						Daniel Bilik
						neosystem.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 21:19 Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25 Jan Kara
2016-01-20 21:39 ` Shaohua Li
2016-01-21  9:52   ` Jan Kara
2016-01-21 13:29     ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-22  1:10     ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-22 16:09       ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-23  2:20         ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-23 16:11           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26  9:34             ` Jan Kara
2016-01-26  9:49               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26 11:14               ` Petr Mladek
2016-01-26 13:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03  9:35                   ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-03 10:41                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 12:28                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 16:24                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 16:48                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 16:59                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-04  6:37                             ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04  7:40                               ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 17:01                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 17:06                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 17:13                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 17:15                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-04  2:00                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 16:49                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05 20:47                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 20:54                                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05 20:59                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05 21:06                                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-06 13:07                                         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-02-07  5:19                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-07  5:59                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 15:31                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 16:39                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-09 16:50                                             ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:04                                               ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 17:54                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:56                                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 18:02                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-09 18:27                                                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 17:04                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-09 17:51                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-09 18:06                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-04 10:04                             ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-04 10:46                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-04 11:07                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-04 11:20                                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 16:39                                   ` Daniel Bilik
2016-02-05  2:40                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-05  8:11                                       ` Daniel Bilik [this message]
2016-02-05  8:33                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-03 18:46                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 19:01                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-03 19:05                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-02-03 19:15                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-05  5:44                         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160205091146.d25db60f5c68229056aad82f@neosystem.cz \
    --to=daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).