* [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags
@ 2024-04-22 15:26 Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-04-23 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-25 3:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen @ 2024-04-22 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen, linux-kernel, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Siddharth Vadapalli,
Ravi Gunasekaran, Roger Quadros, linux-omap
This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
Use flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() to check for control flags,
such as can be set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()
sets a NL extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Only compile-tested.
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
index 764ed298b570..6fe4edabba44 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
@@ -1404,6 +1404,9 @@ static int cpsw_qos_clsflower_add_policer(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+ if (flow_rule_match_has_control_flags(rule, extack))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (!flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Not matching on eth address");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags
2024-04-22 15:26 [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
@ 2024-04-23 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-23 15:31 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-04-25 3:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2024-04-23 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Siddharth Vadapalli,
Ravi Gunasekaran, Roger Quadros, linux-omap
Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:26:55PM CEST, ast@fiberby.net wrote:
>This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
>
>Use flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() to check for control flags,
>such as can be set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
>
>In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()
>sets a NL extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
>Only compile-tested.
>
>Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Next time, could you please bundle similar/related patches into
a patchset?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags
2024-04-23 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2024-04-23 15:31 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen @ 2024-04-23 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Siddharth Vadapalli,
Ravi Gunasekaran, Roger Quadros, linux-omap
Hi Jiri,
Thank you for the reviews.
On 4/23/24 12:57 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Next time, could you please bundle similar/related patches into
> a patchset?
Sure, I did it per driver to make it easier to handle differences in
get_maintainer output and be able to integrate feedback into later patches
for other drivers, and since the patches could be applied individually.
When I started I through that more drivers had their own trees, wasn't
aware that it was only Intel, and that mlx5-next was dead.
For instance the feedback from Jianbo on mlx5 patch, also went into the
octeontx2-pf patch.
I only have one patch left in the queue now (for qede).
--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags
2024-04-22 15:26 [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-04-23 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2024-04-25 3:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-04-25 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: =?utf-8?b?QXNiasO4cm4gU2xvdGggVMO4bm5lc2VuIDxhc3RAZmliZXJieS5uZXQ+?=
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, s-vadapalli,
r-gunasekaran, rogerq, linux-omap
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:26:55 +0000 you wrote:
> This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
>
> Use flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() to check for control flags,
> such as can be set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
>
> In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()
> sets a NL extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f97e0a5eac15
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-25 3:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-22 15:26 [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-04-23 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-23 15:31 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-04-25 3:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).