LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
Cc: Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Linux MTD List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, rafal@milecki.pl, kursad.oney@broadcom.com,
	joel.peshkin@broadcom.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	anand.gore@broadcom.com, dregan@mail.com,
	kamal.dasu@broadcom.com, tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com,
	dan.beygelman@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add BCMBCA read data bus interface
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:18:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230608081821.1de5a50b@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b393f47-4053-a8c7-f32e-3881d8130d80@broadcom.com>

Hi William,

william.zhang@broadcom.com wrote on Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:24:23 -0700:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On 06/07/2023 01:22 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi William,
> > 
> > william.zhang@broadcom.com wrote on Tue,  6 Jun 2023 16:12:50 -0700:
> >   
> >> The BCMBCA broadband SoC integrates the NAND controller differently than
> >> STB, iProc and other SoCs.  It has different endianness for NAND cache
> >> data and ONFI parameter data.
> >>
> >> Add a SoC read data bus shim for BCMBCA to meet the specific SoC need
> >> and performance improvement using the optimized memcpy function on NAND
> >> cache memory.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c    | 44 ++++++++++++++-------
> >>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h    |  2 +
> >>   3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
> >> index 7e48b6a0bfa2..899103a62c98 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
> >> @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum {
> >>   	BCMBCA_CTLRDY		= BIT(4),
> >>   };  
> >>   >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64)  
> >> +#define ALIGN_REQ		8
> >> +#else
> >> +#define ALIGN_REQ		4
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(void *flash_cache,  void *buffer)
> >> +{
> >> +	return IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buffer, ALIGN_REQ) &&
> >> +				IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)flash_cache, ALIGN_REQ);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static bool bcmbca_nand_intc_ack(struct brcmnand_soc *soc)
> >>   {
> >>   	struct bcmbca_nand_soc *priv =
> >> @@ -56,6 +68,29 @@ static void bcmbca_nand_intc_set(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en)
> >>   	brcmnand_writel(val, mmio);
> >>   }  
> >>   >> +static void bcmbca_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_soc *soc,  
> >> +				 void __iomem *flash_cache,  u32 *buffer,
> >> +				 int fc_words, bool is_param)
> >> +{
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!is_param) {
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * memcpy can do unaligned aligned access depending on source
> >> +		 * and dest address, which is incompatible with nand cache. Fallback
> >> +		 * to the memcpy for io version
> >> +		 */
> >> +		if (bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(flash_cache, buffer))
> >> +			memcpy((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4);
> >> +		else
> >> +			memcpy_fromio((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4);
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		/* Flash cache has same endian as the host for parameter pages */
> >> +		for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++, buffer++)
> >> +			*buffer = __raw_readl(flash_cache + i * 4);
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>   {
> >>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> @@ -75,6 +110,7 @@ static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  
> >>   >>   	soc->ctlrdy_ack = bcmbca_nand_intc_ack;  
> >>   	soc->ctlrdy_set_enabled = bcmbca_nand_intc_set;
> >> +	soc->read_data_bus = bcmbca_read_data_bus;  
> >>   >>   	return brcmnand_probe(pdev, soc);  
> >>   }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> index d920e88c7f5b..656be4d73016 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> >> @@ -814,6 +814,30 @@ static inline u32 edu_readl(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl,
> >>   	return brcmnand_readl(ctrl->edu_base + offs);
> >>   }  
> >>   >> +static inline void brcmnand_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl,  
> >> +					   void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer,
> >> +					   int fc_words, bool is_param)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct brcmnand_soc *soc = ctrl->soc;
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	if (soc->read_data_bus) {
> >> +		soc->read_data_bus(soc, flash_cache, buffer, fc_words, is_param);
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		if (!is_param) {
> >> +			for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++, buffer++)
> >> +				*buffer = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i);
> >> +		} else {
> >> +			for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++)
> >> +				/*
> >> +				 * Flash cache is big endian for parameter pages, at
> >> +				 * least on STB SoCs
> >> +				 */
> >> +				buffer[i] = be32_to_cpu(brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i));
> >> +		}
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > Perhaps we could have a single function that is statically assigned at
> > probe time instead of a first helper with two conditions which calls in
> > one case another hook... This can be simplified I guess.
> >   
> Well this will need to be done at the SoC specific implementation level (bcm<xxx>_nand.c) and each SoC will need to have either general data bus read func with is_param option or data_bus_read_page, data_bus_read_param.

You told me in case we would use exec_op we could avoid the param
cache. If that's true then the whole support can be simplified.

>  Not sure how much this can be simplified... Or we have default
> implementation in brcmnand.c but then there is one condition check
> too. Page read is done at 512 bytes burst. One or two conditions
> check outside of the per 512 bytes read loop does not sounds too bad
> if performance is concern.

It is unreadable. That is my main concern.

> 
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static void brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
> >>   {  
> >>   >> @@ -1811,20 +1835,11 @@ static void brcmnand_cmdfunc(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned command,  
> >>   			native_cmd == CMD_PARAMETER_CHANGE_COL) {
> >>   		/* Copy flash cache word-wise */
> >>   		u32 *flash_cache = (u32 *)ctrl->flash_cache;
> >> -		int i;  
> >>   >>   		brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(ctrl->soc, true);
> >>   >> -		/*  
> >> -		 * Must cache the FLASH_CACHE now, since changes in
> >> -		 * SECTOR_SIZE_1K may invalidate it
> >> -		 */
> >> -		for (i = 0; i < FC_WORDS; i++)
> >> -			/*
> >> -			 * Flash cache is big endian for parameter pages, at
> >> -			 * least on STB SoCs
> >> -			 */
> >> -			flash_cache[i] = be32_to_cpu(brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i));
> >> +		brcmnand_read_data_bus(ctrl, ctrl->nand_fc, flash_cache,
> >> +				   FC_WORDS, true);  
> >>   >>   		brcmnand_soc_data_bus_unprepare(ctrl->soc, true);
> >>   >> @@ -2137,7 +2152,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,  
> >>   {
> >>   	struct brcmnand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> >>   	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
> >> -	int i, j, ret = 0;
> >> +	int i, ret = 0;  
> >>   >>   	brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(ctrl);
> >>   >> @@ -2150,8 +2165,9 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,  
> >>   		if (likely(buf)) {
> >>   			brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(ctrl->soc, false);  
> >>   >> -			for (j = 0; j < FC_WORDS; j++, buf++)  
> >> -				*buf = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, j);
> >> +			brcmnand_read_data_bus(ctrl, ctrl->nand_fc, buf,
> >> +					FC_WORDS, false);
> >> +			buf += FC_WORDS;  
> >>   >>   			brcmnand_soc_data_bus_unprepare(ctrl->soc, false);  
> >>   		}
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
> >> index f1f93d85f50d..88819bc395f8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ struct brcmnand_soc {
> >>   	void (*ctlrdy_set_enabled)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en);
> >>   	void (*prepare_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool prepare,
> >>   				 bool is_param);
> >> +	void (*read_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, void __iomem *flash_cache,
> >> +				 u32 *buffer, int fc_words, bool is_param);
> >>   	const struct brcmnand_io_ops *ops;
> >>   };  
> >>   > >   
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
> >   


Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06 23:12 [PATCH 00/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 01/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix ECC level field setting for v7.2 controller William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:06   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 02/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix potential false time out warning William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 03/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix crash during the panic_write William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 04/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix potential out-of-bounds access in oob write William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:09   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 05/12] dt-bindings: mtd: brcmnand: Updates for bcmbca SoCs William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:14   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-07 20:01     ` William Zhang
2023-06-09  8:58       ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-09 19:05         ` William Zhang
2023-06-12 17:43           ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-14 22:46     ` Rob Herring
2023-06-15  0:40       ` William Zhang
2023-06-14 22:43   ` Rob Herring
2023-06-15  0:28     ` William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 06/12] ARM: dts: broadcom: bcmbca: Add NAND controller node William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 07/12] arm64: " William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 08/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Rename bcm63138 nand driver William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 09/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add new compatible string William Zhang
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 10/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add BCMBCA read data bus interface William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:20   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-07 20:12     ` William Zhang
2023-06-08  6:15       ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-08 19:04         ` William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:22   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-07 20:24     ` William Zhang
2023-06-08  6:18       ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-06-08 19:10         ` William Zhang
2023-06-09  8:35           ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-09 19:16             ` William Zhang
2023-06-12 17:49               ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-12 17:53                 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-12 19:18                   ` William Zhang
2023-06-13  6:42                     ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-14  0:00                       ` William Zhang
2023-06-14  6:22                         ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-14 23:52                           ` William Zhang
2023-06-12 19:03                 ` William Zhang
2023-06-11  9:54   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 11/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting ecc setting from strap William Zhang
2023-06-07  8:25   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-06 23:12 ` [PATCH 12/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Support write protection setting from dts William Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230608081821.1de5a50b@xps-13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=anand.gore@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.beygelman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dregan@mail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel.peshkin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kamal.dasu@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kursad.oney@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=william.zhang@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).