LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ftrace: Allow inline functions not inlined to be traced
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:44:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230609174422.04824a9e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Over 10 years ago there were many bugs that caused function tracing to
crash because some inlined function was not inlined and should not have
been traced. This made it hard to debug because when the developer tried
to reproduce it, if their compiler still inlined the function, the bug
would not trigger. The solution back then was simply to add "notrace" to
"inline" which would make sure all functions that are marked inline are
never traced even when the compiler decides to not inline them.

A lot has changed over the last 10 years.

1) ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() is now used by all ftrace hooks which
   will prevent the recursive crashes from happening that was caused by
   inlined functions being traced.

2) noinstr is now used to mark pretty much all functions that would also
   cause problems if they are traced.

Today, it is no longer a problem if an inlined function is not inlined and
is traced, at least on x86. Removing notrace from inline has been requested
several times over the years. I believe it is now safe to do so.

Currently only x86 uses this.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230502164102.1a51cdb4@gandalf.local.home

 - have it opted in by architecture. Currently only x86 adds it. (Mark Rutland)

 arch/x86/Kconfig               |  1 +
 include/linux/compiler_types.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
 kernel/trace/Kconfig           |  7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index da5c081d64a5..1ddebf832534 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ config X86
 	select ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP	if ACPI
 	select ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT	if ACPI
 	select ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T			if X86_32
+	select ARCH_CAN_TRACE_INLINE
 	select ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_INIT
 	select ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE
 	select ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION if X86_64 && HUGETLB_PAGE && MIGRATION
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
index 547ea1ff806e..f827e2a98500 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
@@ -169,6 +169,16 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
 #define notrace			__attribute__((__no_instrument_function__))
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * If all inline code not marked as __always_inline is safe to trace,
+ * then allow the architecture to do so.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_TRACE_INLINE
+#define __notrace_inline
+#else
+#define __notrace_inline	notrace
+#endif
+
 /*
  * it doesn't make sense on ARM (currently the only user of __naked)
  * to trace naked functions because then mcount is called without
@@ -184,7 +194,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
  * of extern inline functions at link time.
  * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing.
  */
-#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused notrace
+#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused __notrace_inline
 
 /*
  * gcc provides both __inline__ and __inline as alternate spellings of
@@ -230,7 +240,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
  *     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
  * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
  */
-# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address notrace __maybe_unused
+# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address __notrace_inline __maybe_unused
 # define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kasan_or_inline
 #else
 # define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
@@ -247,7 +257,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
  * disable all instrumentation. See Kconfig.kcsan where this is mandatory.
  */
 # define __no_kcsan __no_sanitize_thread __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation
-# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan notrace __maybe_unused
+# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan __notrace_inline __maybe_unused
 #else
 # define __no_kcsan
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
index abe5c583bd59..b66ab0e6ce19 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
@@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
          An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section
 	 at build time.
 
+config ARCH_CAN_TRACE_INLINE
+       bool
+       help
+         It is safe for an architecture to trace any function marked
+	 as inline (not __always_inline) that the compiler decides to
+	 not inline.
+
 config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
        bool
        default y
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-06-09 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-09 21:44 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-06-12  9:56 ` [PATCH v2] ftrace: Allow inline functions not inlined to be traced Mark Rutland
2023-06-12 13:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-06-12 15:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-13 15:40   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230609174422.04824a9e@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).