LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: display: ssd1307fb: Remove default width and height values
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 19:14:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230610-unused-engaged-c1f4119cff08@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0qj19zs.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1536 bytes --]

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 07:51:35PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> A default resolution in the ssd130x driver isn't set to an arbitrary 96x16
> >> anymore. Instead is set to a width and height that's controller dependent.
> >
> > Did that change to the driver not break backwards compatibility with
> > existing devicetrees that relied on the default values to get 96x16?
> >
> 
> It would but I don't think it is an issue in pratice. Most users of these
> panels use one of the multiple libraries on top of the spidev interface.
> 
> For the small userbase that don't, I believe that they will use the rpif
> kernel and ssd1306-overlay.dtbo DTB overlay, which defaults to width=128
> and height=64 [1]. So those users will have to explicitly set a width and
> height for a 96x16 panel anyways.
> 
> The intersection of users that have a 96x16 panel, assumed that default
> and consider the DTB a stable ABI, and only update their kernel but not
> the  DTB should be very small IMO.

It's the adding of new defaults that makes it a bit messier, since you
can't even revert without potentially breaking a newer user. I'd be more
inclined to require the properties, rather change their defaults in the
binding, lest there are people relying on them.
If you and the other knowledgeable folk in the area really do know such
users do not exist then I suppose it is fine to do.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-10 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-09 17:09 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/ssd130x: A few enhancements and cleanups Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/ssd130x: Make default width and height to be controller dependent Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: display: ssd1307fb: Remove default width and height values Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-10 15:10   ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-10 17:51     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-10 18:14       ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-06-10 23:18         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-12  7:47           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-06-12 17:44             ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-12 18:30               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/ssd130x: Set the page height value in the device info data Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/ssd130x: Don't allocate buffers on each plane update Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-07-13 12:44   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-13 13:15     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-07-13 13:25       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-13 14:12         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-07-13 14:53           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-13 16:34             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/ssd130x: Remove hardcoded bits-per-pixel in ssd130x_buf_alloc() Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-07-12 10:24   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-15 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/ssd130x: A few enhancements and cleanups Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230610-unused-engaged-c1f4119cff08@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).