From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, willemb@google.com, edumazet@google.com,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, tklauser@distanz.ch,
fruggeri@aristanetworks.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pankaj.m@samsung.com, gh007.kim@samsung.com,
hakbong5.lee@samsung.com, Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:29:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569CBE86.8030107@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569CB419.6050102@iogearbox.net>
On 01/18/2016 10:44 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 07:37 AM, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> Receieve queue is not purged when socket dectruction is called
>> results in kernel warning because of non zero sk_rmem_alloc.
>>
>> WARNING: at net/packet/af_packet.c:1142 packet_sock_destruct
>>
>> Backtrace:
>> WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)
>> packet_sock_destruct
>> __sk_free
>> sock_wfree
>> skb_release_head_state
>> skb_release_all
>> __kfree_skb
>> net_tx_action
>> __do_softirq
>> run_ksoftirqd
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks for the fix. While it fixes the WARN_ON(), I believe some more
> investigation is needed here on why it is happening:
>
> We call first into packet_release(), which removes the socket hook from
> the kernel (unregister_prot_hook()), later calls synchronize_net() to
> make sure no more skbs will come in. The receive queue is purged right
> after the synchronize_net() already.
>
> packet_sock_destruct() will be called afterwards, when there are no more
> refs on the socket anymore and no af_packet skbs in tx waiting for completion.
(...and in your above case, there seem to have been some skbs in tx from
{t,}packet_snd(), as we call __sk_free() via kfree_skb() (-> sock_wfree()).)
> Only then, in sk_destruct(), we'll call into packet_sock_destruct().
>
> So, eventually double purging the sk_receive_queue seems not the right
> thing to do at first look, and w/o any deeper analysis in the commit description.
>
> Could you look a bit further into the issue? Do you have a reproducer to
> trigger it?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 6:37 [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix Maninder Singh
2016-01-18 9:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-18 10:29 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-02-05 11:26 ` Eric Dumazet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-18 10:11 Vaneet Narang
2016-01-18 11:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-21 11:40 Maninder Singh
2016-01-26 0:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-02-05 5:23 Vaneet Narang
2016-02-10 12:43 Vaneet Narang
2016-02-10 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569CBE86.8030107@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=fruggeri@aristanetworks.com \
--cc=gh007.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=hakbong5.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.m@samsung.com \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=v.narang@samsung.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).