LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: maninder1.s@samsung.com, Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"willemb@google.com" <willemb@google.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"eyal.birger@gmail.com" <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
	"tklauser@distanz.ch" <tklauser@distanz.ch>,
	"fruggeri@aristanetworks.com" <fruggeri@aristanetworks.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@samsung.com>,
	Geon-ho Kim <gh007.kim@samsung.com>,
	Hak-Bong Lee <hakbong5.lee@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 01:13:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A6BA2D.2090604@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2036003091.741801453376409338.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas01a>

On 01/21/2016 12:40 PM, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> The other sock_put() in packet_release() to drop the final ref and call into
>> sk_free(), which drops the 1 ref on the sk_wmem_alloc from init time. Since you
>> got into __sk_free() via sock_wfree() destructor, your socket must have invoked
>> packet_release() prior to this (perhaps kernel destroying the process).
>>
>> What kernel do you use?
>
> Issue is coming for 3.10.58.

[ sorry for late reply ]

What driver are you using (is that in-tree)? Can you reproduce the same issue
with a latest -net kernel, for example (or, a 'reasonably' recent one like 4.3 or
4.4)? There has been quite a bit of changes in err queue handling (which also
accounts rmem) as well. How reliably can you trigger the issue? Does it trigger
with a completely different in-tree network driver as well with your tests? Would
be useful to track/debug sk_rmem_alloc increases/decreases to see from which path
new rmem is being charged in the time between packet_release() and packet_sock_destruct()
for that socket ...

>>> Driver calls dev_kfree_skb_any->dev_kfree_skb_irq
>>> and it adds buffer in completion queue to free and raises softirq NET_TX_SOFTIRQ
>>>
>>> net_tx_action->__kfree_skb->skb_release_all->skb_release_head_state->sock_wfree->
>>> __sk_free->packet_sock_destruct
>>>
>>> Also purging of receive queue has been taken care in other protocols.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-26  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-21 11:40 [PATCH] af_packet: Raw socket destruction warning fix Maninder Singh
2016-01-26  0:13 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-10 12:43 Vaneet Narang
2016-02-10 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-02-05  5:23 Vaneet Narang
2016-01-18 10:11 Vaneet Narang
2016-01-18 11:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-18  6:37 Maninder Singh
2016-01-18  9:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-18 10:29   ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-02-05 11:26   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A6BA2D.2090604@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=fruggeri@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=gh007.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=hakbong5.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.m@samsung.com \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
    --cc=v.narang@samsung.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).