From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.116-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 12:06:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whA=HsyDFtgQnWMZP-08ddhMh1a88OZHCXf8N-iP6hFQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d35b1ff1-e198-481c-b1be-9e22445efe06@roeck-us.net>
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 11:42 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> I managed to revise my bisect script sufficiently enough to get reliable
> results. It looks like the culprit is commit 503e554782c9 (" debugobject:
> Ensure pool refill (again)"); see bisect log below. Bisect on four
> different systems all have the same result. After reverting this patch,
> I do not see the problem anymore (again, confirmed on four different
> systems).
Does this happen on mainline too? It's commit 0af462f19e63 in the upstream tree.
It was in 6.4-rc1, and I see a clean result from you at least for
-rc2, so for some reason it sounds like upstream is ok. But I don't
really see why that would be the case...
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 20:15 [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.116-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-07 20:17 ` [PATCH 5.15 142/159] test_firmware: fix the memory leak of the allocated firmware buffer Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-07 23:55 ` [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.116-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2023-06-08 1:26 ` Shuah Khan
2023-06-08 7:20 ` Chris Paterson
2023-06-08 11:28 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-08 14:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-06-08 15:44 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-06-08 22:04 ` Ron Economos
2023-06-09 8:37 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-06-09 11:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-09 18:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-09 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2023-06-09 19:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-12 9:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-10 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2023-06-10 21:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-11 15:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-12 1:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-06-09 16:17 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whA=HsyDFtgQnWMZP-08ddhMh1a88OZHCXf8N-iP6hFQw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).