From: Charlie Johnston <charlie.johnston@ni.com>
To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brenda.streiff@ni.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pps: Increase PPS_MAX_SOURCES value.
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:07:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b794bccc-0233-4d78-df6f-bf7c688a7d7d@ni.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe435e68-8e05-9078-0fe6-63ef7cce2fc9@enneenne.com>
On 6/7/23 02:33, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 05/06/23 22:31, Charlie Johnston wrote:
>> For consistency with what ptp uses for minors, this
>> change sets PPS_MAX_SOURCES to MINORMASK + 1.
>>
>> The PPS_MAX_SOURCES value is currently set to 16. In
>> some cases this was not sufficient for a system. For
>> example, a system with multiple (4+) PCIe cards each
>> with 4 PTP-capable ethernet interfaces could run out
>> of the available PPS major:minors if each interface
>> registers a PPS source.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charlie Johnston <charlie.johnston@ni.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/pps.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pps.h b/include/uapi/linux/pps.h
>> index 009ebcd8ced5..85f472330da8 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pps.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pps.h
>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #define PPS_VERSION "5.3.6"
>> -#define PPS_MAX_SOURCES 16 /* should be enough... */
>> +#define PPS_MAX_SOURCES (MINORMASK + 1)
>> /* Implementation note: the logical states ``assert'' and ``clear''
>> * are implemented in terms of the chip register, i.e. ``assert''
>
> I have just one question: are you sure that it's safe to call idr_alloc(..., 0, (MINORMASK + 1), ...)?
>
> Ciao,
>
> Rodolfo
>
Thanks for taking a look!
My understanding is that idr_alloc(..., start, end, ...) can take any end value up to INT_MAX. It also handles any values <= 0 by treating them as equal to INT_MAX + 1 since the end value is non-inclusive. I can't think of any reason using MINORMASK + 1 here would be an issue since it's much less than the maximum value idr_alloc() allows.
A number of drivers (e.g. ptp) just explicitly use a start and end value of 0, but I don't think that change would fit here.
Regards,
Charlie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-07 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-05 20:31 [RFC PATCH] pps: Increase PPS_MAX_SOURCES value Charlie Johnston
2023-06-07 7:33 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2023-06-07 22:07 ` Charlie Johnston [this message]
2023-06-09 7:30 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2023-06-09 21:00 ` Charlie Johnston
2023-06-12 16:07 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2023-06-20 20:42 ` Charlie Johnston
2023-06-21 15:31 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2023-06-23 2:03 ` Charlie Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b794bccc-0233-4d78-df6f-bf7c688a7d7d@ni.com \
--to=charlie.johnston@ni.com \
--cc=brenda.streiff@ni.com \
--cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).