qemu-riscv.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
To: Aleksei Filippov <alexei.filippov@syntacore.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com,
	bmeng@tinylab.org, liwei1518@gmail.com,
	zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, palmer@rivosinc.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	Joseph Chan <jchan@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-9.0] target/riscv: prioritize pmp errors in raise_mmu_exception()
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:26:49 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70b7f011-e091-426a-b4aa-88ed9f112c79@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4a23a7a-04fb-494d-b13a-933ab1a93ffa@syntacore.com>



On 4/12/24 13:52, Aleksei Filippov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.04.2024 19:00, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for giving it a go. You're right, this patch alone is not enough and we'll
>> need your patch too.
>>
>> But note that, with what you've said in mind, your patch will also end up setting
>> mtval2 and env->guest_phys_fault_addr in case a PMP fault occurs during the
>> get_physical_address() right at the start of second stage:
>>
>>          if (ret == TRANSLATE_SUCCESS) {
>>              /* Second stage lookup */
>>              im_address = pa;
>>
>>              ret = get_physical_address(env, &pa, &prot2, im_address, NULL,
>>                                         access_type, MMUIdx_U, false, true,
>>                                         false);
>>
>>
>> I think your patch needs to also prevent env->guest_phys_fault_addr to be set when
>> ret == TRANSLATE_PMP_FAIL.
>>
>> With these changes in your patch, and this patch, we're free to set "first_stage_error = false;"
>> at the start of second stage lookup, keeping consistency, because raise_mmu_exception is now
>> able to deal with it. I can amend this change in this patch. This patch would prioritize
>> PMP errors, your patch will fix the problem with mtval2.
>>
>> Let me know what do you think. If you agree I can re-send both patches together.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Daniel
> 
> Oh, I actually missed that, thx, you are right. I could prepare patch to fix
> this, do you want it in this thread or in previous with only my patch in?

If you don't mind, please re-send it together in a new thread with this patch too.

Include this one as is, then include yours as a complement that fixes the problem
with mtval2 that my patch missed. You can use the explanation you gave me as the
new commit msg for your patch. E.g:

"target/riscv: do not set mtval2 for non guest-page faults

Previous patch fixed the PMP priority in raise_mmu_exception() but we're still
setting mtval2 incorrectly. In riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(), after pmp check in 2 stage
translation part, mtval2 will be set in case of successes 2 stage translation but
failed pmp check.

In this case we gonna set mtval2 via env->guest_phys_fault_addr in context of
riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(), as this was a guest-page-fault, but it didn't and mtval2
should be zero, according to RISCV privileged spec sect. 9.4.4: When a guest
page-fault is taken into M-mode, mtval2 is written with either zero or guest
physical address that faulted, shifted by 2 bits. *For other traps, mtval2
is set to zero...* "


Thanks,

Daniel

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09 17:52 [PATCH for-9.0] target/riscv: prioritize pmp errors in raise_mmu_exception() Daniel Henrique Barboza
2024-04-12 14:15 ` Aleksei Filippov
2024-04-12 16:00   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2024-04-12 16:52     ` Aleksei Filippov
2024-04-12 17:26       ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2024-04-12 17:12 ` Peter Maydell
2024-04-12 17:19   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70b7f011-e091-426a-b4aa-88ed9f112c79@ventanamicro.com \
    --to=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexei.filippov@syntacore.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bmeng@tinylab.org \
    --cc=jchan@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).