From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <321def3e-8bf1-4920-92dd-037b20f1272d@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiKSffcTiP2c6fbs@kernel.org>
Le 19/04/2024 à 17:49, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300
>> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
>>> enabled in non-modular kernels.
>>>
>>> Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside
>>> modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the
>>> dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES.
>>
>> Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4.
>> Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in
>> function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should
>> not make a problem.
>
> The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for
> __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES).
> I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body,
> whichever you prefer.
As far as I can see, the only problem is MODULE_STATE_COMING.
Can we move 'enum module_state' out of #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES in module.h ?
>
>> --
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <321def3e-8bf1-4920-92dd-037b20f1272d@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiKSffcTiP2c6fbs@kernel.org>
Le 19/04/2024 à 17:49, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300
>> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
>>> enabled in non-modular kernels.
>>>
>>> Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside
>>> modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the
>>> dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES.
>>
>> Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4.
>> Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in
>> function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should
>> not make a problem.
>
> The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for
> __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES).
> I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body,
> whichever you prefer.
As far as I can see, the only problem is MODULE_STATE_COMING.
Can we move 'enum module_state' out of #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES in module.h ?
>
>> --
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <321def3e-8bf1-4920-92dd-037b20f1272d@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiKSffcTiP2c6fbs@kernel.org>
Le 19/04/2024 à 17:49, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300
>> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
>>> enabled in non-modular kernels.
>>>
>>> Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside
>>> modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the
>>> dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES.
>>
>> Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4.
>> Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in
>> function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should
>> not make a problem.
>
> The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for
> __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES).
> I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body,
> whichever you prefer.
As far as I can see, the only problem is MODULE_STATE_COMING.
Can we move 'enum module_state' out of #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES in module.h ?
>
>> --
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bpf@vger.kerne l.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <321def3e-8bf1-4920-92dd-037b20f1272d@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiKSffcTiP2c6fbs@kernel.org>
Le 19/04/2024 à 17:49, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300
>> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
>>> enabled in non-modular kernels.
>>>
>>> Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside
>>> modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the
>>> dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES.
>>
>> Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4.
>> Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in
>> function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should
>> not make a problem.
>
> The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for
> __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES).
> I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body,
> whichever you prefer.
As far as I can see, the only problem is MODULE_STATE_COMING.
Can we move 'enum module_state' out of #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES in module.h ?
>
>> --
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 178+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] arm64: module: remove uneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] nios2: define virtual address space for modules Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] riscv: extend execmem_params " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropiate Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=321def3e-8bf1-4920-92dd-037b20f1272d@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=echanude@redhat.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu@gmail.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.