From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:42:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zhg9DXzagPbpNGH1@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-6-rppt@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:41PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
>
> Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
> that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and
> puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
>
> Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
> constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
> additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
>
> Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing execmem_alloc()
> and execmem_free() APIs.
>
> Initially, execmem_alloc() is a wrapper for module_alloc() and
> execmem_free() is a replacement of module_memfree() to allow updating all
> call sites to use the new APIs.
>
> Since architectures define different restrictions on placement,
> permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used by
> different subsystems that allocate executable memory, execmem_alloc() takes
> a type argument, that will be used to identify the calling subsystem and to
> allow architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for that
> subsystem.
It would be good to describe this is a non-fuctional change.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed2ea41a2543
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
And this just needs to copy over the copyright notices from the main.c file.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:42:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zhg9DXzagPbpNGH1@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-6-rppt@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:41PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
>
> Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
> that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and
> puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
>
> Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
> constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
> additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
>
> Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing execmem_alloc()
> and execmem_free() APIs.
>
> Initially, execmem_alloc() is a wrapper for module_alloc() and
> execmem_free() is a replacement of module_memfree() to allow updating all
> call sites to use the new APIs.
>
> Since architectures define different restrictions on placement,
> permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used by
> different subsystems that allocate executable memory, execmem_alloc() takes
> a type argument, that will be used to identify the calling subsystem and to
> allow architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for that
> subsystem.
It would be good to describe this is a non-fuctional change.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed2ea41a2543
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
And this just needs to copy over the copyright notices from the main.c file.
Luis
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:42:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zhg9DXzagPbpNGH1@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-6-rppt@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:41PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
>
> Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
> that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and
> puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
>
> Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
> constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
> additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
>
> Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing execmem_alloc()
> and execmem_free() APIs.
>
> Initially, execmem_alloc() is a wrapper for module_alloc() and
> execmem_free() is a replacement of module_memfree() to allow updating all
> call sites to use the new APIs.
>
> Since architectures define different restrictions on placement,
> permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used by
> different subsystems that allocate executable memory, execmem_alloc() takes
> a type argument, that will be used to identify the calling subsystem and to
> allow architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for that
> subsystem.
It would be good to describe this is a non-fuctional change.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed2ea41a2543
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
And this just needs to copy over the copyright notices from the main.c file.
Luis
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:42:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zhg9DXzagPbpNGH1@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-6-rppt@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:41PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
>
> Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
> that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and
> puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
>
> Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
> constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
> additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
>
> Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing execmem_alloc()
> and execmem_free() APIs.
>
> Initially, execmem_alloc() is a wrapper for module_alloc() and
> execmem_free() is a replacement of module_memfree() to allow updating all
> call sites to use the new APIs.
>
> Since architectures define different restrictions on placement,
> permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used by
> different subsystems that allocate executable memory, execmem_alloc() takes
> a type argument, that will be used to identify the calling subsystem and to
> allow architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for that
> subsystem.
It would be good to describe this is a non-fuctional change.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed2ea41a2543
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
And this just needs to copy over the copyright notices from the main.c file.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 178+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] arm64: module: remove uneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] nios2: define virtual address space for modules Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] riscv: extend execmem_params " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropiate Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zhg9DXzagPbpNGH1@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=echanude@redhat.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.