* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipul Gandhi, Shanker Donthineni, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
kvm
From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
This patch adds define for Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU
implementer ID 0x51 and part number for Kryo in asm/cputype.h.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
index a84ec60..6978764 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
#define ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM 0x41
#define ARM_CPU_IMP_APM 0x50
+#define ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM 0x51
#define ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8 0xD0F
#define ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION 0xD00
@@ -84,6 +85,9 @@
#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN (0x1 << 5)
#define SCTLR_EL1_SED (0x1 << 8)
+#define QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK 0xF00
+#define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO 0x200
+
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
/*
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
This patch adds define for Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU
implementer ID 0x51 and part number for Kryo in asm/cputype.h.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
index a84ec60..6978764 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
#define ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM 0x41
#define ARM_CPU_IMP_APM 0x50
+#define ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM 0x51
#define ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8 0xD0F
#define ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION 0xD00
@@ -84,6 +85,9 @@
#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN (0x1 << 5)
#define SCTLR_EL1_SED (0x1 << 8)
+#define QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK 0xF00
+#define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO 0x200
+
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
/*
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] arm64: KVM: Add VCPU support for Qualcomm Technologies Kryo ARMv8 CPU
2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipul Gandhi, Shanker Donthineni, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
kvm
From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
This patch enables assignment of 32/64bit guest VCPU to
Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU. Added KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO
to the KVM target list and modified vm_target_cpu() to return
KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO when CPU running in AArch64 mode.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index d268320..426933e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -59,8 +59,9 @@ struct kvm_regs {
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57 2
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA 3
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A53 4
+#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO 5
-#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 5
+#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 6
/* KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR ioctl id encoding */
#define KVM_ARM_DEVICE_TYPE_SHIFT 0
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 9535bd5..836cf16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -291,6 +291,12 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA;
};
break;
+ case ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM:
+ switch (part_number & QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK) {
+ case QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO:
+ return KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO;
+ }
+ break;
};
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index 475fd29..3712ea8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init sys_reg_genericv8_init(void)
&genericv8_target_table);
kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
&genericv8_target_table);
+ kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO,
+ &genericv8_target_table);
return 0;
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] arm64: KVM: Add VCPU support for Qualcomm Technologies Kryo ARMv8 CPU
@ 2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
This patch enables assignment of 32/64bit guest VCPU to
Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU. Added KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO
to the KVM target list and modified vm_target_cpu() to return
KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO when CPU running in AArch64 mode.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index d268320..426933e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -59,8 +59,9 @@ struct kvm_regs {
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57 2
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA 3
#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A53 4
+#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO 5
-#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 5
+#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 6
/* KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR ioctl id encoding */
#define KVM_ARM_DEVICE_TYPE_SHIFT 0
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 9535bd5..836cf16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -291,6 +291,12 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA;
};
break;
+ case ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM:
+ switch (part_number & QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK) {
+ case QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO:
+ return KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO;
+ }
+ break;
};
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index 475fd29..3712ea8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init sys_reg_genericv8_init(void)
&genericv8_target_table);
kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
&genericv8_target_table);
+ kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO,
+ &genericv8_target_table);
return 0;
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-06-15 10:59 ` Catalin Marinas
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2015-06-15 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi
Cc: Vipul Gandhi, Shanker Donthineni, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
kvm
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:57:42PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
>
> This patch adds define for Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU
> implementer ID 0x51 and part number for Kryo in asm/cputype.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
tree. For the core arm64 part:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-15 10:59 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2015-06-15 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:57:42PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
>
> This patch adds define for Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU
> implementer ID 0x51 and part number for Kryo in asm/cputype.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
tree. For the core arm64 part:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: KVM: Add VCPU support for Qualcomm Technologies Kryo ARMv8 CPU
2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-06-16 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-06-16 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi, Vipul Gandhi, Shanker Donthineni, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, kvm, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Suzuki Poulose
In the future, please add the KVM/ARM maintainers on Cc.
On 12/06/15 22:57, Timur Tabi wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
>
> This patch enables assignment of 32/64bit guest VCPU to
> Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU. Added KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO
> to the KVM target list and modified vm_target_cpu() to return
> KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO when CPU running in AArch64 mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index d268320..426933e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -59,8 +59,9 @@ struct kvm_regs {
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57 2
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA 3
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A53 4
> +#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO 5
>
> -#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 5
> +#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 6
>
> /* KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR ioctl id encoding */
> #define KVM_ARM_DEVICE_TYPE_SHIFT 0
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 9535bd5..836cf16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,12 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
> return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA;
> };
> break;
> + case ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM:
> + switch (part_number & QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK) {
> + case QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO;
> + }
> + break;
> };
>
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> index 475fd29..3712ea8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init sys_reg_genericv8_init(void)
> &genericv8_target_table);
> kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
> &genericv8_target_table);
> + kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO,
> + &genericv8_target_table);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
That's getting slightly out of hand and I think we need to stop being
paranoid.
All our target CPUs are using the generic tables, and this looks like an
unnecessary complexity as long as we choose to ignore
cross-microarchitecture migration (things like big-little or live
migration from one CPU type to another).
Let's just implement a default target that works for everything. Should
we support some CPUs in a more specific manner, it will then be worth
adding to that list. I believe Suzuki (cc-ed) has something brewing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] arm64: KVM: Add VCPU support for Qualcomm Technologies Kryo ARMv8 CPU
@ 2015-06-16 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-06-16 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
In the future, please add the KVM/ARM maintainers on Cc.
On 12/06/15 22:57, Timur Tabi wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
>
> This patch enables assignment of 32/64bit guest VCPU to
> Qualcomm Technologies ARMv8 CPU. Added KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO
> to the KVM target list and modified vm_target_cpu() to return
> KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO when CPU running in AArch64 mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index d268320..426933e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -59,8 +59,9 @@ struct kvm_regs {
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57 2
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA 3
> #define KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A53 4
> +#define KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO 5
>
> -#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 5
> +#define KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS 6
>
> /* KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR ioctl id encoding */
> #define KVM_ARM_DEVICE_TYPE_SHIFT 0
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 9535bd5..836cf16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,12 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
> return KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA;
> };
> break;
> + case ARM_CPU_IMP_QCOM:
> + switch (part_number & QCOM_CPU_PART_MASK) {
> + case QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO:
> + return KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO;
> + }
> + break;
> };
>
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> index 475fd29..3712ea8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init sys_reg_genericv8_init(void)
> &genericv8_target_table);
> kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
> &genericv8_target_table);
> + kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_QCOM_KRYO,
> + &genericv8_target_table);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
That's getting slightly out of hand and I think we need to stop being
paranoid.
All our target CPUs are using the generic tables, and this looks like an
unnecessary complexity as long as we choose to ignore
cross-microarchitecture migration (things like big-little or live
migration from one CPU type to another).
Let's just implement a default target that works for everything. Should
we support some CPUs in a more specific manner, it will then be worth
adding to that list. I believe Suzuki (cc-ed) has something brewing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
2015-06-15 10:59 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2015-06-19 22:28 ` Timur Tabi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-19 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Vipul Gandhi, Shanker Donthineni, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
kvm
On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
> tree. For the core arm64 part:
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM
targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first
patch through the ARM tree?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-19 22:28 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-19 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
> tree. For the core arm64 part:
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM
targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first
patch through the ARM tree?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
2015-06-19 22:28 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-06-22 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2015-06-22 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi
Cc: linux-arm-msm, Vipul Gandhi, linux-arm-kernel, Shanker Donthineni,
kvm
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:28:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
> >tree. For the core arm64 part:
> >
> >Acked-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
> Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM
> targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first patch
> through the ARM tree?
So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I
would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the
kernel.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-22 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2015-06-22 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:28:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm
> >tree. For the core arm64 part:
> >
> >Acked-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
> Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM
> targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first patch
> through the ARM tree?
So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I
would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the
kernel.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
2015-06-22 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2015-06-22 12:36 ` Timur Tabi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-22 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: linux-arm-msm, Vipul Gandhi, linux-arm-kernel, Shanker Donthineni,
kvm
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I
> would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the
> kernel.
Fair enough.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR)
@ 2015-06-22 12:36 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-06-22 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I
> would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the
> kernel.
Fair enough.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-22 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-12 21:57 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR) Timur Tabi
2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-12 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: KVM: Add VCPU support for Qualcomm Technologies Kryo ARMv8 CPU Timur Tabi
2015-06-12 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-16 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR) Catalin Marinas
2015-06-15 10:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-19 22:28 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-19 22:28 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-22 11:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-22 12:36 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 12:36 ` Timur Tabi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.