All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:28:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615112800.273e42d4@hananiah.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150615091100.GA15858@dhcp-128-59.nay.redhat.com>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:11:00 +0800
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/14/15 at 11:50pm, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > From experimentation and from looking at the sources, it appears that
> > the signature checking is only done in the kexec_file_load(2) system
> > all, and not in the kexec_load(2) system call.  And I understand why
> > -- the signature is not sent from userspace to the kernel in the older
> > kexec_load(2) system call.
> > 
> > The problem is that if you use an old version of kexec, it will use
> > the old kexec_load(2) system call, and even though
> > CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, kexec_load(2) will happily load an
> > unsigned kernel, and then "kexec -e" will happily boot into it.
> > 
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but this appears to be a hole in Secure Boot
> > you could drive a Mack Truck through.
> > 
> > (I noticed this because Debian is still using a kexec-tools from the
> > stone ages, version 2.0.7, and I was wondering **why** I was able to
> > kexec boot completely unsigned kernels.)
> > 
> > It would appear to me that if CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, the
> > old kexec_load(2) system call should be disabled (and a warning be
> > placed in the Kconfig help that the user should have at least verision
> > 2.X of kexec-tools if they enable this kernel option).
> 
> IMO it is fine to disable old syscall incase CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY=y

Definitely. It is not possible to to sign all code passed through
kexec_load(2), at least not without giving kexec-tools the private part
of the key (which would effectively destroy the goal of Secure Boot).

Whenever signature verification is required, kexec_load(2) must be
disabled.

Petr Tesarik

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15  3:50 kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15  3:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15  9:11 ` Dave Young
2015-06-15  9:28   ` Petr Tesarik [this message]
2015-06-15 12:14 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 12:14   ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 13:17   ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 13:17     ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 13:37     ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 13:37       ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 20:01       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 20:01         ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-16 19:38         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-16 19:38           ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-16 20:27           ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-16 20:27             ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17  1:32             ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-17  1:32               ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-17  1:47               ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17  1:47                 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18  1:16                 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18  1:16                   ` Dave Young
2015-06-18  2:02                   ` Dave Young
2015-06-18  2:02                     ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 13:30                     ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 13:30                       ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 14:41                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-18 14:41                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-19  6:21                       ` Dave Young
2015-06-19  6:21                         ` Dave Young
2015-06-19  8:18                         ` Dave Young
2015-06-19  8:18                           ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09                           ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-19 13:09                             ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-25  8:48                             ` Dave Young
2015-06-25  8:48                               ` Dave Young
2015-06-25 15:59                               ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-25 15:59                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-26  1:59                                 ` Dave Young
2015-06-26  1:59                                   ` Dave Young
2015-06-19  7:04                 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19  7:04                   ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09                   ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-19 13:09                     ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17  3:26             ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-17  3:26               ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-17 10:55         ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-06-17 10:55           ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-06-18  1:25         ` Dave Young
2015-06-18  1:25           ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150615112800.273e42d4@hananiah.suse.cz \
    --to=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.