From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:09:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150619130933.GB13714@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150619081816.GK4636@dhcp-128-32.nay.redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:18:16PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > If we want to disable unsigned kernel loading at compile time, then we
> > > really need to work on decoupling CONFIG_KEXEC and CONFIG_FILE_KEXEC.
> > > Introducing another config option is not the way forward, IMHO.
> >
> > Yes, let's do it in this way since everyone is fine with it.
>
> I will work on a patch if nobody else have interest or no time on it.
Thanks Dave. Will be good if you can get this done.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:09:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150619130933.GB13714@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150619081816.GK4636@dhcp-128-32.nay.redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:18:16PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > If we want to disable unsigned kernel loading at compile time, then we
> > > really need to work on decoupling CONFIG_KEXEC and CONFIG_FILE_KEXEC.
> > > Introducing another config option is not the way forward, IMHO.
> >
> > Yes, let's do it in this way since everyone is fine with it.
>
> I will work on a patch if nobody else have interest or no time on it.
Thanks Dave. Will be good if you can get this done.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 3:50 kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 3:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 9:11 ` Dave Young
2015-06-15 9:28 ` Petr Tesarik
2015-06-15 12:14 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 12:14 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 13:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 13:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 13:37 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 13:37 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 20:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 20:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-16 19:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-16 19:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-16 20:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-16 20:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17 1:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-17 1:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-17 1:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17 1:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 1:16 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 1:16 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 2:02 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 2:02 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 13:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 13:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 14:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-18 14:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-19 6:21 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 6:21 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 8:18 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 8:18 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-25 8:48 ` Dave Young
2015-06-25 8:48 ` Dave Young
2015-06-25 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-25 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-26 1:59 ` Dave Young
2015-06-26 1:59 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 7:04 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 7:04 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17 3:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-17 3:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-17 10:55 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-06-17 10:55 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-06-18 1:25 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 1:25 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150619130933.GB13714@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.