All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 8/8] zsmalloc: register a shrinker to trigger auto-compaction
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:58:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150618035820.GE3422@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150618033922.GB2370@bgram>

On (06/18/15 12:39), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > ah, I see.
> > it doesn't hold the lock `until all the pages are done`. it holds it
> > as long as zs_can_compact() returns > 0. hm, I'm not entirely sure that
> > this patch set has increased the locking time (in average).
> 
> I see your point. Sorry for the consusing.
> My point is not average but max time. I bet your patch will increase
> it and it will affect others who want to allocate zspage in parallel on
> another CPU.

makes sense.

[..]
> > > Yes, it's not easy and I believe a few artificial testing are not enough
> > > to prove no regression but we don't have any choice.
> > > Actually, I think this patchset does make sense. Although it might have
> > > a problem on situation heavy memory pressure by lacking of fragment space,
> > 
> > 
> > I tested exactly this scenario yesterday (and sent an email). We leave `no holes'
> > in classes only in ~1.35% of cases. so, no, this argument is not valid. we preserve
> > fragmentation.
> 
> Thanks, Sergey.
> 
> I want to test by myself to simulate worst case scenario to make to use up
> reserved memory by zram. For it, please fix below first and resubmit, please.
> 
> 1. doesn't hold lock until class compation is done.
>    It could prevent another allocation on another CPU.
>    I want to make worst case scenario and it needs it.
> 
> 2. No touch ZS_ALMOST_FULL waterline. It can put more zspages
>    in ZS_ALMOST_FULL list so it couldn't be selected by migration
>    source.
> 
> With new patchset, I want to watch min(free_pages of the system),
> zram.max_used_pages, testing time and so on.
> 
> Really sorry for bothering you, Sergey but I think it's important
> feature on zram so I want to be careful because risk management is
> my role.

ok. will take a day or two to gather new numbers.

	-ss

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 8/8] zsmalloc: register a shrinker to trigger auto-compaction
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:58:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150618035820.GE3422@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150618033922.GB2370@bgram>

On (06/18/15 12:39), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > ah, I see.
> > it doesn't hold the lock `until all the pages are done`. it holds it
> > as long as zs_can_compact() returns > 0. hm, I'm not entirely sure that
> > this patch set has increased the locking time (in average).
> 
> I see your point. Sorry for the consusing.
> My point is not average but max time. I bet your patch will increase
> it and it will affect others who want to allocate zspage in parallel on
> another CPU.

makes sense.

[..]
> > > Yes, it's not easy and I believe a few artificial testing are not enough
> > > to prove no regression but we don't have any choice.
> > > Actually, I think this patchset does make sense. Although it might have
> > > a problem on situation heavy memory pressure by lacking of fragment space,
> > 
> > 
> > I tested exactly this scenario yesterday (and sent an email). We leave `no holes'
> > in classes only in ~1.35% of cases. so, no, this argument is not valid. we preserve
> > fragmentation.
> 
> Thanks, Sergey.
> 
> I want to test by myself to simulate worst case scenario to make to use up
> reserved memory by zram. For it, please fix below first and resubmit, please.
> 
> 1. doesn't hold lock until class compation is done.
>    It could prevent another allocation on another CPU.
>    I want to make worst case scenario and it needs it.
> 
> 2. No touch ZS_ALMOST_FULL waterline. It can put more zspages
>    in ZS_ALMOST_FULL list so it couldn't be selected by migration
>    source.
> 
> With new patchset, I want to watch min(free_pages of the system),
> zram.max_used_pages, testing time and so on.
> 
> Really sorry for bothering you, Sergey but I think it's important
> feature on zram so I want to be careful because risk management is
> my role.

ok. will take a day or two to gather new numbers.

	-ss

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-18  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 12:03 [RFC][PATCHv2 0/8] introduce automatic pool compaction Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 1/8] zsmalloc: drop unused variable `nr_to_migrate' Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 2/8] zsmalloc: partial page ordering within a fullness_list Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 13:19   ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 13:19     ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 14:30     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 14:30       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 3/8] zsmalloc: lower ZS_ALMOST_FULL waterline Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 13:37   ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 13:37     ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 14:35     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 14:35       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 4/8] zsmalloc: always keep per-class stats Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 5/8] zsmalloc: introduce zs_can_compact() function Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 14:19   ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 14:19     ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 14:41     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 14:41       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 6/8] zsmalloc: cosmetic compaction code adjustments Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 7/8] zsmalloc/zram: move `num_migrated' to zs_pool Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 8/8] zsmalloc: register a shrinker to trigger auto-compaction Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-05 12:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 14:47   ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 14:47     ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-16 15:45     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-16 15:45       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-18  1:50       ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  1:50         ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  2:41         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-18  2:41           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-18  3:01           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-18  3:01             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-18  3:46             ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  3:46               ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  3:39           ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  3:39             ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-18  3:58             ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2015-06-18  3:58               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-17  7:11     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-17  7:11       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-10  0:04 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 0/8] introduce automatic pool compaction Minchan Kim
2015-06-10  0:04   ` Minchan Kim
2015-06-10  0:07   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-10  0:07     ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150618035820.GE3422@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.