All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:51:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713165151.GC10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150713164315.GC22840@leverpostej>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:43:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:25:56PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > Currently, the minimal default BUG() implementation from asm-
> > generic is used for arm64.
> > 
> > This patch uses the BRK software breakpoint instruction to generate
> > a trap instead, similarly to most other arches, with the generic
> > BUG code generating the dmesg boilerplate.

[...]

> FWIW I've given this a spin and it seems to work, so:
> 
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks for testing.

> I have one concern with this below.
> 
> > +#ifndef _ARCH_ARM64_ASM_BUG_H
> > +#define _ARCH_ARM64_ASM_BUG_H
> > +
> > +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
> > +#define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> > +#define _BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line) __BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)
> > +#define __BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)				\
> > +		".pushsection .rodata.str,\"aMS\", at progbits,1\n"	\
> > +	"2:	.string \"" file "\"\n\t"				\
> > +		".popsection\n\t"					\
> > +									\
> > +		".long 2b - 0b\n\t"					\
> > +		".short " #line "\n\t"
> > +#else
> > +#define _BUGVERBOSE_LOCATION(file, line)
> > +#endif
> 
> Given the reliance on the labels in the caller, I think it might make

Not sure what you mean here, can you elaborate?

> more sense to fold this into __BUG_FLAGS, and just have an #ifdef in the
> middle.
> 
> That would also mean passing file and line to the macro for the general
> case, like on arch/arm (even if !CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE), and moving
> the double-indirection of those out to the caller.

I'll take a look -- it is probably more complex at present than it needs
to be.

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51     ` Dave Martin [this message]
2015-07-13 16:56       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05         ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20         ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 11:09           ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34             ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51               ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53                 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 16:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150713165151.GC10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.