All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714102025.GD10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150713165638.GD22840@leverpostej>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:56:39PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:51:51PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:43:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:

[...]

> > > Given the reliance on the labels in the caller, I think it might make
> > 
> > Not sure what you mean here, can you elaborate?
> 
> We're relying on label "0:" in the caller/user of the macro when we emit
> ".long 2b - 0b".
> 
> I think it would be clearer if folded into the caller (even with the
> inline ifdef this necessitates).
> 
> Though I could be missing something here that renders that impossible.

Before I respin the series, can you cast your eye over this
alternative?

I'm testing it now, but in any case it should make the conditional
structure of the code clearer as per your suggestion.

Cheers
---Dave


[...]

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
#define __BUGVERBOSE(x...) x
#else
#define __BUGVERBOSE(x...)
#endif

#define _BUG_FLAGS(flags, file, line) __BUG_FLAGS(flags, file, line)

#define __BUG_FLAGS(flags, file, line) asm volatile (			\
 __BUGVERBOSE(	".pushsection .rodata.str,\"aMS\", at progbits,1\n"	\
	"2:	.string \"" file "\"\n\t"				\
		".popsection\n\t"				)	\
									\
		".pushsection __bug_table,\"a\"\n\t"			\
		".align 2\n\t"						\
	"0:	.long 1f - 0b\n\t"					\
 __BUGVERBOSE(	".long 2b - 0b\n\t"					\
		".short " #line "\n\t"	)				\
		".short " #flags "\n\t"					\
		".popsection\n"						\
									\
	"1:	brk %[imm]"						\
		:: [imm] "i" (BUG_BRK_IMM)				\
)

#define BUG() do {				\
	_BUG_FLAGS(0, __FILE__, __LINE__);	\
	unreachable();				\
} while (0)

#define __WARN_TAINT(taint)					\
	_BUG_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint), __FILE__, __LINE__)

[...]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-14 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:56       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05         ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20         ` Dave Martin [this message]
2015-07-14 11:09           ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34             ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51               ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53                 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 16:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150714102025.GD10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.