From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:53:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714165347.GG10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714155127.GD12675@leverpostej>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:51:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:34:35PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
[...]
> > I could repeat it on every line and rearrange/reindent things so that
> > __BUGVERBOSE doesn't get in the way of the labels, but IMHO that's
> > uglier and not really more readable.
> >
> > Are we getting into dimishing returns here?
>
> I guess so.
>
> For any of the variants posted in this thread so far:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
OK, thanks.
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05 ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2015-07-14 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150714165347.GG10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.