From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>,
users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Superseded-by: follow-up trailer
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:57:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414155733.GO227011@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414145619.packpzwjauqj4fug@nitro.local>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:56:19AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:36:18AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> I think submitter tooling is a separate discussion that should happen in a
> different thread, which I'll start shortly (it slots into my auto-pr-exploder
> work). I'll just comment on the below:
I'm nervous asking submitters to change their workflows without
providing any tooling to help :(
> > For v2:
> > - Pull in all tags from the mailing list and update the git commits
> > (b4 downloads the tags but doesn't automate fixing the local git
> > branch)
>
> The best workflow I can recommend here is:
>
> 1. create a new branch from the latest upstream, e.g. myfoo_v1
> 2. "b4 am/git am" your own v1 (this has an added bonus of rebasing it)
> 3. create a new branch from myfoo_v1 as myfoo_v2
> 4. make any changes to myfoo_v2
This isn't workable - it assumes the user will only change the patches
after all the tags have been sent because it resets the whole branch
to the as-sent condition.
Usually I would make changes to the series as the discussion evolves
and resync the tags only before resending the next version.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 20:49 RFC: Superseded-by: follow-up trailer Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-13 20:53 ` Alex Elder
2021-04-13 21:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-04-13 21:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-13 21:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-14 0:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-14 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 11:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-14 13:57 ` James Bottomley
2021-04-14 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-14 14:56 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-14 15:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-04-14 17:07 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-14 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-14 17:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-14 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2021-04-14 18:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-14 15:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-14 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 17:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-04-14 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-14 18:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 14:35 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-14 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 12:52 ` Alex Elder
2021-04-13 21:04 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414155733.GO227011@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=elder@ieee.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.