From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow non-shared device HW interrupts
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:50:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581975A.8070509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55819445.4090309@arm.com>
On 06/17/2015 05:37 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 17/06/15 16:11, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>> On 06/08/2015 07:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> So far, the only use of the HW interrupt facility is the timer,
>>> implying that the active state is context-switched for each vcpu,
>>> as the device is is shared across all vcpus.
>> s/is//
>>>
>>> This does not work for a device that has been assigned to a VM,
>>> as the guest is entierely in control of that device (the HW is
>> entirely?
>>> not shared). In that case, it makes sense to bypass the whole
>>> active state srtwitchint, and only track the deactivation of the
>> switching
>
> Congratulations, I think you're now ready to try deciphering my
> handwriting... ;-)
good to see you're not a machine or maybe you do it on purpose some
times ;-)
>
>>> interrupt.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 5 +++--
>>> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 2 +-
>>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> index 1c653c1..5d47d60 100644
>>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ struct irq_phys_map {
>>> u32 virt_irq;
>>> u32 phys_irq;
>>> u32 irq;
>>> - bool active;
>>> + bool shared;
>>> + bool active; /* Only valid if shared */
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct vgic_dist {
>>> @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg);
>>> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_active_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> - int virt_irq, int irq);
>>> + int virt_irq, int irq, bool shared);
>>> int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map);
>>> bool vgic_get_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map);
>>> void vgic_set_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map, bool active);
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> index b9fff78..9544d79 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> * Tell the VGIC that the virtual interrupt is tied to a
>>> * physical interrupt. We do that once per VCPU.
>>> */
>>> - timer->map = vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, irq->irq, host_vtimer_irq);
>>> + timer->map = vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, irq->irq, host_vtimer_irq, true);
>>> WARN_ON(!timer->map);
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> index f376b56..4223166 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> @@ -1125,18 +1125,21 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq,
>>> map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, irq);
>>>
>>> if (map) {
>>> - int ret;
>>> -
>>> - BUG_ON(!map->active);
>>> vlr.hwirq = map->phys_irq;
>>> vlr.state |= LR_HW;
>>> vlr.state &= ~LR_EOI_INT;
>>>
>>> - ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> - IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> - true);
>>> vgic_irq_set_queued(vcpu, irq);
>>
>> the queued state is set again in vgic_queue_hwirq for level_sensitive
>> IRQs although not harmful.
>
> Indeed. We still need it for edge interrupts though. I'll try to find a
> nicer way...
>
>>> - WARN_ON(ret);
>>> +
>>> + if (map->shared) {
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON(!map->active);
>>> + ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> + IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> + true);
>>> + WARN_ON(ret);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1368,21 +1371,28 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> static int vgic_sync_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_lr vlr)
>>> {
>>> struct irq_phys_map *map;
>>> + bool active;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> if (!(vlr.state & LR_HW))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>>> - BUG_ON(!map || !map->active);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(map->shared && !map->active);
>>>
>>> ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> - &map->active);
>>> + &active);
>>>
>> In case of non shared and EOIMode = 1 - I know this is not your current
>> interest here though ;-) - , once the guest EOIs its virtual IRQ and GIC
>> deactivates the physical one, a new phys IRQ can hit immediatly, the
>> physical handler can be entered and the state is seen as active here.
>> The queued state is never reset in such a case and the system gets stuck
>> since the can_sample fails I think. What I mean here is sounds the state
>> machine as is does not work for my VFIO case. So some adaptations still
>> are needed I think. Do you share my diagnosis?
>
> Yup, there is something that doesn't quite work here.
>
> I think the mistake is to sample the distributor active state. I wonder
> if I can simply rely on the LR state. If it is neither pending nor
> active, it means that we have done the deactivation, and we can then
> reset the queued state.
I tried to use the LR in the past - it was also Christoffer's will - but
it was not working. I observed injection before seeing the LR voided.
This is why I resorted to using the pending state instead and treated
forwarded IRQ as edge in vgic_queue_hwirq. sampling could be done only
if the IRQ was pending.
Eric
>
> As a bonus, it would save a read from MMIO, which is often dog slow.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> M.
>>
>> Eric
>>>
>>> - if (map->active) {
>>> + if (!map->shared)
>>> + return !active;
>>> +
>>> + map->active = active;
>>> +
>>> + if (active) {
>>> ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> false);
>>> @@ -1663,7 +1673,7 @@ static struct rb_root *vgic_get_irq_phys_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> }
>>>
>>> struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> - int virt_irq, int irq)
>>> + int virt_irq, int irq, bool shared)
>>> {
>>> struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
>>> struct rb_root *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
>>> @@ -1710,6 +1720,7 @@ struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> new_map->virt_irq = virt_irq;
>>> new_map->phys_irq = phys_irq;
>>> new_map->irq = irq;
>>> + new_map->shared = shared;
>>>
>>> rb_link_node(&new_map->node, parent, new);
>>> rb_insert_color(&new_map->node, root);
>>> @@ -1746,13 +1757,13 @@ static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>
>>> bool vgic_get_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map)
>>> {
>>> - BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map || !map->shared);
>>> return map->active;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void vgic_set_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map, bool active)
>>> {
>>> - BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map || !map->shared);
>>> map->active = active;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow non-shared device HW interrupts
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:50:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581975A.8070509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55819445.4090309@arm.com>
On 06/17/2015 05:37 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 17/06/15 16:11, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>> On 06/08/2015 07:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> So far, the only use of the HW interrupt facility is the timer,
>>> implying that the active state is context-switched for each vcpu,
>>> as the device is is shared across all vcpus.
>> s/is//
>>>
>>> This does not work for a device that has been assigned to a VM,
>>> as the guest is entierely in control of that device (the HW is
>> entirely?
>>> not shared). In that case, it makes sense to bypass the whole
>>> active state srtwitchint, and only track the deactivation of the
>> switching
>
> Congratulations, I think you're now ready to try deciphering my
> handwriting... ;-)
good to see you're not a machine or maybe you do it on purpose some
times ;-)
>
>>> interrupt.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 5 +++--
>>> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 2 +-
>>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> index 1c653c1..5d47d60 100644
>>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ struct irq_phys_map {
>>> u32 virt_irq;
>>> u32 phys_irq;
>>> u32 irq;
>>> - bool active;
>>> + bool shared;
>>> + bool active; /* Only valid if shared */
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct vgic_dist {
>>> @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg);
>>> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_active_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> - int virt_irq, int irq);
>>> + int virt_irq, int irq, bool shared);
>>> int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map);
>>> bool vgic_get_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map);
>>> void vgic_set_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map, bool active);
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> index b9fff78..9544d79 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> * Tell the VGIC that the virtual interrupt is tied to a
>>> * physical interrupt. We do that once per VCPU.
>>> */
>>> - timer->map = vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, irq->irq, host_vtimer_irq);
>>> + timer->map = vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, irq->irq, host_vtimer_irq, true);
>>> WARN_ON(!timer->map);
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> index f376b56..4223166 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> @@ -1125,18 +1125,21 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq,
>>> map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, irq);
>>>
>>> if (map) {
>>> - int ret;
>>> -
>>> - BUG_ON(!map->active);
>>> vlr.hwirq = map->phys_irq;
>>> vlr.state |= LR_HW;
>>> vlr.state &= ~LR_EOI_INT;
>>>
>>> - ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> - IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> - true);
>>> vgic_irq_set_queued(vcpu, irq);
>>
>> the queued state is set again in vgic_queue_hwirq for level_sensitive
>> IRQs although not harmful.
>
> Indeed. We still need it for edge interrupts though. I'll try to find a
> nicer way...
>
>>> - WARN_ON(ret);
>>> +
>>> + if (map->shared) {
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON(!map->active);
>>> + ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> + IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> + true);
>>> + WARN_ON(ret);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1368,21 +1371,28 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> static int vgic_sync_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_lr vlr)
>>> {
>>> struct irq_phys_map *map;
>>> + bool active;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> if (!(vlr.state & LR_HW))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>>> - BUG_ON(!map || !map->active);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(map->shared && !map->active);
>>>
>>> ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> - &map->active);
>>> + &active);
>>>
>> In case of non shared and EOIMode = 1 - I know this is not your current
>> interest here though ;-) - , once the guest EOIs its virtual IRQ and GIC
>> deactivates the physical one, a new phys IRQ can hit immediatly, the
>> physical handler can be entered and the state is seen as active here.
>> The queued state is never reset in such a case and the system gets stuck
>> since the can_sample fails I think. What I mean here is sounds the state
>> machine as is does not work for my VFIO case. So some adaptations still
>> are needed I think. Do you share my diagnosis?
>
> Yup, there is something that doesn't quite work here.
>
> I think the mistake is to sample the distributor active state. I wonder
> if I can simply rely on the LR state. If it is neither pending nor
> active, it means that we have done the deactivation, and we can then
> reset the queued state.
I tried to use the LR in the past - it was also Christoffer's will - but
it was not working. I observed injection before seeing the LR voided.
This is why I resorted to using the pending state instead and treated
forwarded IRQ as edge in vgic_queue_hwirq. sampling could be done only
if the IRQ was pending.
Eric
>
> As a bonus, it would save a read from MMIO, which is often dog slow.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> M.
>>
>> Eric
>>>
>>> - if (map->active) {
>>> + if (!map->shared)
>>> + return !active;
>>> +
>>> + map->active = active;
>>> +
>>> + if (active) {
>>> ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>>> IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>>> false);
>>> @@ -1663,7 +1673,7 @@ static struct rb_root *vgic_get_irq_phys_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> }
>>>
>>> struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> - int virt_irq, int irq)
>>> + int virt_irq, int irq, bool shared)
>>> {
>>> struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
>>> struct rb_root *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
>>> @@ -1710,6 +1720,7 @@ struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> new_map->virt_irq = virt_irq;
>>> new_map->phys_irq = phys_irq;
>>> new_map->irq = irq;
>>> + new_map->shared = shared;
>>>
>>> rb_link_node(&new_map->node, parent, new);
>>> rb_insert_color(&new_map->node, root);
>>> @@ -1746,13 +1757,13 @@ static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>
>>> bool vgic_get_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map)
>>> {
>>> - BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map || !map->shared);
>>> return map->active;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void vgic_set_phys_irq_active(struct irq_phys_map *map, bool active)
>>> {
>>> - BUG_ON(!map);
>>> + BUG_ON(!map || !map->shared);
>>> map->active = active;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 17:03 [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix ordering of timer/GIC on guest entry Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 11:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Move vgic handling to a non-preemptible section Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:38 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 11:38 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Convert struct vgic_lr to use bitfields Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:12 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 13:12 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-10 17:23 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-10 17:23 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-10 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:21 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 13:21 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 11:53 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:53 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 12:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 13:21 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-17 13:21 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-17 13:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 13:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Relax vgic_can_sample_irq for edge IRQs Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 9:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 9:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-02 16:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-02 16:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-03 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 9:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:43 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:43 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 15:44 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 15:44 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-16 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16 9:10 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-16 9:10 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 11:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW interrupts to be queued to a guest Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 9:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 9:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 16:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 16:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 12:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get, set}_phys_irq_active Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get,set}_phys_irq_active Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get, set}_phys_irq_active Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get,set}_phys_irq_active Eric Auger
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: timer: Allow the timer to control the active state Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow non-shared device HW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:50 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2015-06-17 15:50 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 8:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-18 8:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-18 17:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 17:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 8:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 8:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-10 8:33 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Eric Auger
2015-06-10 8:33 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-10 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 11:13 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-10 11:13 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 6:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 6:51 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5581975A.8070509@linaro.org \
--to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.