All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
	rcampbell@nvidia.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	jglisse@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jgg@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_*
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:14:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9cc27d6-b0f2-8379-c276-0bbdae3ce4d7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPGgvNxfOCx/Sp0g@mit.edu>

Am 2021-07-16 um 11:07 a.m. schrieb Theodore Y. Ts'o:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> I can think of two ways to test the changes for MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC in
>> this patch series in a way that is reproducible without special hardware and
>> firmware:
>>
>> For the reference counting changes we could use the dax driver with hmem and
>> use efi_fake_mem on the kernel command line to create some DEVICE_GENERIC
>> pages. I'm open to suggestions for good user mode tests to exercise dax
>> functionality on this type of memory.
> Sorry for the thread necromancy, but now that the merge window is
> past....

No worries. Alejandro should have a new version of this series in a few
days, with updates to hmm_test and some fixes.


>
> Today I test ext4's dax support, without having any $$$ DAX hardware,
> by using the kernel command line "memmap=4G!9G:memmap=9G!14G" which
> reserves memory so that creates two pmem device and then I run
> xfstests with DAX enabled using qemu or using a Google Compute Engine
> VM, using TEST_DEV=/dev/pmem0 and SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/pmem1.
>
> If you can give me a recipe for what kernel configs I should enable,
> and what magic kernel command line arguments to use, then I'd be able
> to test your patch set with ext4.
That would be great!

Regarding kernel config options, it should be the same as what you're
using for DAX testing today. We're not changing or adding any Kconfig
options. But let me take a stab:

ZONE_DEVICE
HMM_MIRROR
MMU_NOTIFIER
DEVICE_PRIVATE (maybe not needed for your test)
FS_DAX

I'm not sure what you're looking for in terms of kernel command line,
other than the memmap options you already found. There are some more
options to run hmm_test with fake SPM (DEVICE_GENERIC) memory, but we're
already running that ourselves. That will also be in the next revision
of this patch series.

If you can run your xfstests with DAX on top of this patch series, that
would be very helpful. That's to make sure the ZONE_DEVICE page refcount
changes don't break DAX.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Cheers,
>
> 						- Ted
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, hch@lst.de, jgg@nvidia.com,
	jglisse@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_*
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:14:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9cc27d6-b0f2-8379-c276-0bbdae3ce4d7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPGgvNxfOCx/Sp0g@mit.edu>

Am 2021-07-16 um 11:07 a.m. schrieb Theodore Y. Ts'o:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> I can think of two ways to test the changes for MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC in
>> this patch series in a way that is reproducible without special hardware and
>> firmware:
>>
>> For the reference counting changes we could use the dax driver with hmem and
>> use efi_fake_mem on the kernel command line to create some DEVICE_GENERIC
>> pages. I'm open to suggestions for good user mode tests to exercise dax
>> functionality on this type of memory.
> Sorry for the thread necromancy, but now that the merge window is
> past....

No worries. Alejandro should have a new version of this series in a few
days, with updates to hmm_test and some fixes.


>
> Today I test ext4's dax support, without having any $$$ DAX hardware,
> by using the kernel command line "memmap=4G!9G:memmap=9G!14G" which
> reserves memory so that creates two pmem device and then I run
> xfstests with DAX enabled using qemu or using a Google Compute Engine
> VM, using TEST_DEV=/dev/pmem0 and SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/pmem1.
>
> If you can give me a recipe for what kernel configs I should enable,
> and what magic kernel command line arguments to use, then I'd be able
> to test your patch set with ext4.
That would be great!

Regarding kernel config options, it should be the same as what you're
using for DAX testing today. We're not changing or adding any Kconfig
options. But let me take a stab:

ZONE_DEVICE
HMM_MIRROR
MMU_NOTIFIER
DEVICE_PRIVATE (maybe not needed for your test)
FS_DAX

I'm not sure what you're looking for in terms of kernel command line,
other than the memmap options you already found. There are some more
options to run hmm_test with fake SPM (DEVICE_GENERIC) memory, but we're
already running that ourselves. That will also be in the next revision
of this patch series.

If you can run your xfstests with DAX on top of this patch series, that
would be very helpful. That's to make sure the ZONE_DEVICE page refcount
changes don't break DAX.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Cheers,
>
> 						- Ted

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
	rcampbell@nvidia.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	jglisse@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jgg@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_*
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:14:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9cc27d6-b0f2-8379-c276-0bbdae3ce4d7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPGgvNxfOCx/Sp0g@mit.edu>

Am 2021-07-16 um 11:07 a.m. schrieb Theodore Y. Ts'o:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> I can think of two ways to test the changes for MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC in
>> this patch series in a way that is reproducible without special hardware and
>> firmware:
>>
>> For the reference counting changes we could use the dax driver with hmem and
>> use efi_fake_mem on the kernel command line to create some DEVICE_GENERIC
>> pages. I'm open to suggestions for good user mode tests to exercise dax
>> functionality on this type of memory.
> Sorry for the thread necromancy, but now that the merge window is
> past....

No worries. Alejandro should have a new version of this series in a few
days, with updates to hmm_test and some fixes.


>
> Today I test ext4's dax support, without having any $$$ DAX hardware,
> by using the kernel command line "memmap=4G!9G:memmap=9G!14G" which
> reserves memory so that creates two pmem device and then I run
> xfstests with DAX enabled using qemu or using a Google Compute Engine
> VM, using TEST_DEV=/dev/pmem0 and SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/pmem1.
>
> If you can give me a recipe for what kernel configs I should enable,
> and what magic kernel command line arguments to use, then I'd be able
> to test your patch set with ext4.
That would be great!

Regarding kernel config options, it should be the same as what you're
using for DAX testing today. We're not changing or adding any Kconfig
options. But let me take a stab:

ZONE_DEVICE
HMM_MIRROR
MMU_NOTIFIER
DEVICE_PRIVATE (maybe not needed for your test)
FS_DAX

I'm not sure what you're looking for in terms of kernel command line,
other than the memmap options you already found. There are some more
options to run hmm_test with fake SPM (DEVICE_GENERIC) memory, but we're
already running that ourselves. That will also be in the next revision
of this patch series.

If you can run your xfstests with DAX on top of this patch series, that
would be very helpful. That's to make sure the ZONE_DEVICE page refcount
changes don't break DAX.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Cheers,
>
> 						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17 15:16 [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_* Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16 ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16 ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4/xfs: add page refcount helper Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 16:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 16:11     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 16:11     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 23:52   ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 23:52     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-17 23:52     ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-19 16:14     ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-19 16:14       ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-19 16:14       ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-19 18:31   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-19 18:31     ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-19 18:31     ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: remove extra ZONE_DEVICE struct page refcount Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:16   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 19:16   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-17 19:16     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-17 19:16     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-28 16:46     ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-28 16:46       ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-28 16:46       ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-30  0:23       ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-30  0:23         ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-30  0:23         ` Ralph Campbell
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] kernel: resource: lookup_resource as exported symbol Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/amdkfd: add SPM support for SVM Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/amdkfd: generic type as sys mem on migration to ram Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] include/linux/mm.h: helpers to check zone device generic type Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] mm: add generic type support to migrate_vma helpers Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] mm: call pgmap->ops->page_free for DEVICE_GENERIC pages Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:17   ` Alex Sierra
2021-06-17 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_* Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-17 15:56   ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-17 15:56   ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-06-20 14:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-20 14:14   ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-20 14:14   ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-23 21:49   ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-23 21:49     ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-23 21:49     ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-24  5:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-24  5:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-24 15:08       ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-24 15:08         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-06-24 15:08         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-07-16 15:07     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-16 15:07       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-16 15:07       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-16 22:14       ` Felix Kuehling [this message]
2021-07-16 22:14         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-07-16 22:14         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-07-17 19:54         ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-17 19:54           ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-17 19:54           ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-23 22:46           ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-23 22:46             ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-23 22:46             ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)
2021-07-30 19:02             ` Felix Kuehling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9cc27d6-b0f2-8379-c276-0bbdae3ce4d7@amd.com \
    --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.