Linux-csky Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, anup@brainfault.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	palmer@rivosinc.com, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com,
	wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 06/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:49:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTQ=K_2km_AUZj1Vg8q2XgWB49-+nxViAa1mSAfppp6dnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZQIgTyJ-DETrK8k3@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:49 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:37:01PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 07:06:23AM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:29:00AM -0400, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > >
> > > > Combo spinlock could support queued and ticket in one Linux Image and
> > > > select them during boot time via errata mechanism. Here is the func
> > > > size (Bytes) comparison table below:
> > > >
> > > > TYPE                      : COMBO | TICKET | QUEUED
> > > > arch_spin_lock            : 106   | 60     | 50
> > > > arch_spin_unlock  : 54    | 36     | 26
> > > > arch_spin_trylock : 110   | 72     | 54
> > > > arch_spin_is_locked       : 48    | 34     | 20
> > > > arch_spin_is_contended    : 56    | 40     | 24
> > > > rch_spin_value_unlocked   : 48    | 34     | 24
> > > >
> > > > One example of disassemble combo arch_spin_unlock:
> > > >    0xffffffff8000409c <+14>:    nop                # detour slot
> > > >    0xffffffff800040a0 <+18>:    fence   rw,w       # queued spinlock start
> > > >    0xffffffff800040a4 <+22>:    sb      zero,0(a4) # queued spinlock end
> > > >    0xffffffff800040a8 <+26>:    ld      s0,8(sp)
> > > >    0xffffffff800040aa <+28>:    addi    sp,sp,16
> > > >    0xffffffff800040ac <+30>:    ret
> > > >    0xffffffff800040ae <+32>:    lw      a5,0(a4)   # ticket spinlock start
> > > >    0xffffffff800040b0 <+34>:    sext.w  a5,a5
> > > >    0xffffffff800040b2 <+36>:    fence   rw,w
> > > >    0xffffffff800040b6 <+40>:    addiw   a5,a5,1
> > > >    0xffffffff800040b8 <+42>:    slli    a5,a5,0x30
> > > >    0xffffffff800040ba <+44>:    srli    a5,a5,0x30
> > > >    0xffffffff800040bc <+46>:    sh      a5,0(a4)   # ticket spinlock end
> > > >    0xffffffff800040c0 <+50>:    ld      s0,8(sp)
> > > >    0xffffffff800040c2 <+52>:    addi    sp,sp,16
> > > >    0xffffffff800040c4 <+54>:    ret
> > > >
> > > > The qspinlock is smaller and faster than ticket-lock when all are in
> > > > fast-path, and combo spinlock could provide a compatible Linux Image
> > > > for different micro-arch design (weak/strict fwd guarantee LR/SC)
> > > > processors.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                |  9 +++-
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c         | 14 ++++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > > index 7f39bfc75744..4bcff2860f48 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
> > > >
> > > >  choice
> > > >   prompt "RISC-V spinlock type"
> > > > - default RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS
> > > > + default RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> > > >
> > > >  config RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS
> > > >   bool "Using ticket spinlock"
> > > > @@ -485,6 +485,13 @@ config RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > > >   help
> > > >     Make sure your micro arch LL/SC has a strong forward progress guarantee.
> > > >     Otherwise, stay at ticket-lock.
> > > > +
> > > > +config RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> > > > + bool "Using combo spinlock"
> > > > + depends on SMP && MMU
> > > > + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > > > + help
> > > > +   Select queued spinlock or ticket-lock via errata.
> > > >  endchoice
> > > >
> > > >  config RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > > > index c644a92d4548..8ea0fee80652 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > > > @@ -7,11 +7,85 @@
> > > >  #define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS (1 << 9)
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> > > > +#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_is_locked
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_is_contended
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_value_unlocked
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_lock
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_trylock
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_unlock
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_is_locked
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_is_contended
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_value_unlocked
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_lock
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_trylock
> > > > +#undef arch_spin_unlock
> > > Sorry, I forgot __no_arch_spinlock_redefine advice here. I would add it in v12.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/4cc7113a-0e4e-763a-cba2-7963bcd26c7a@redhat.com/
> > >
> >
> > Please check a reply to a previous patch I sent earlier: I think these
> > #undef can be avoided.
> >
> > > > +
> > > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(combo_qspinlock_key);
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         queued_spin_lock(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         ticket_spin_lock(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         return queued_spin_trylock(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         return ticket_spin_trylock(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         queued_spin_unlock(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         ticket_spin_unlock(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         return queued_spin_value_unlocked(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         return ticket_spin_value_unlocked(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         return queued_spin_is_locked(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         return ticket_spin_is_locked(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))
> > > > +         return queued_spin_is_contended(lock);
> > > > + else
> > > > +         return ticket_spin_is_contended(lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS */
> > > > +
>
> Also, those functions all reproduce the same behavior, so maybe it would be
> better to keep that behavior in a macro such as:
>
> #define COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(f)                                       \
> static __always_inline int arch_spin_ ## f(arch_spinlock_t *lock)       \
> {                                                                       \
>         if (static_branch_likely(&combo_qspinlock_key))                 \
>                 return queued_spin_ ## f(lock);                         \
>         else                                                            \
>                 return ticket_spin_ ## f(lock);                         \
> }
>
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(lock)
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(trylock)
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(unlock)
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(value_unlocked)
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(is_locked)
> COMBO_SPINLOCK_DECLARE(is_contended)
>
> Does that make sense?
Yeah, thanks. I would try. You improved my macro skills. :)

>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
>
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > > >  #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> > > > -#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> > > >  #else
> > > > -#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h>
> > > > +#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> > > > +
> > > >  #endif /* __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > > index 32c2e1eb71bd..a447cf360a18 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > > > @@ -269,6 +269,18 @@ static void __init parse_dtb(void)
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> > > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(combo_qspinlock_key);
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(combo_qspinlock_key);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> > > > + static_branch_disable(&combo_qspinlock_key);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);
> > > >
> > > >  void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > > @@ -317,6 +329,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > >       riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM))
> > > >           riscv_noncoherent_supported();
> > > >   riscv_set_dma_cache_alignment();
> > > > +
> > > > + riscv_spinlock_init();
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static int __init topology_init(void)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.36.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > > >
> > >
>


-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-14  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-10  8:28 [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 01/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-09-11 19:05   ` Leonardo Brás
2023-09-13  1:55     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  7:59       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 02/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h guoren
2023-09-13  8:15   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 03/17] riscv: Use Zicbop in arch_xchg when available guoren
2023-09-13  8:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 12:36     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-16  1:25       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:34         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:13           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  7:53             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:38               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 13:47   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15  8:22     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 11:07       ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:26         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:22           ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:42             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-16  0:05               ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 20:32         ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 14:25   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-14 14:47     ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:37       ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:14         ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:53           ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-31  8:29   ` guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 04/17] locking/qspinlock: Improve xchg_tail for number of cpus >= 16k guoren
2023-09-11  2:35   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-11  3:09     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 13:03       ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  8:55           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 12:52             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 13:06               ` Waiman Long
2023-09-14  3:45                 ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 05/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-09-13 20:28   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:46     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  9:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15  2:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-15  9:08           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:02             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:20               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 06/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2023-09-10 11:06   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 20:37     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 20:49       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:49         ` Guo Ren [this message]
2023-09-14  7:17           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 07/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce qspinlock param for command line guoren
2023-09-11 15:22   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 15:34   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:08     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  7:32       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 17:23         ` Waiman Long
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 08/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for KVM guest guoren
2023-09-14  8:02   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:12     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:30       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  8:04         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:40           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 09/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-09-14  8:32   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:15     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:34       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 10/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Enable qspinlock for T-HEAD processors guoren
2023-09-14  9:36   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 11/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  5:42   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:58     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 12/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-09-15  6:05   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:03     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:44       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 13/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-09-15  6:23   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:45       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 14/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-09-15  6:25   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 15/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-09-15  6:33   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 16/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  6:46   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 17/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Implement kvm_sbi_ext_pvlock_kick_cpu() guoren
2023-09-15  6:52   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:58 ` [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:16   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:20     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:31     ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:49       ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10 19:45         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-11  3:36           ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 12:52             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12  1:33               ` Guo Ren
2023-09-12  8:07                 ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12 10:58                   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-06 20:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-11-12  4:23   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-13 10:19     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJF2gTQ=K_2km_AUZj1Vg8q2XgWB49-+nxViAa1mSAfppp6dnA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).