Linux-csky Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, anup@brainfault.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	palmer@rivosinc.com, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com,
	wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 08/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for KVM guest
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 05:02:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQK9-tn2MepXlY1u@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230910082911.3378782-9-guoren@kernel.org>

On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:29:02AM -0400, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Add a static key controlling whether virt_spin_lock() should be
> called or not. When running on bare metal set the new key to
> false.
> 
> The KVM guests fall back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair
> locks have horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues. The
> virt_spin_lock_key would shortcut for the
> queued_spin_lock_slowpath() function that allow virt_spin_lock to
> hijack it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  4 +++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h                  |  8 +++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h             | 22 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c                       |  2 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 30 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 61cacb8dfd0e..f75bedc50e00 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3927,6 +3927,10 @@
>  	no_uaccess_flush
>  	                [PPC] Don't flush the L1-D cache after accessing user data.
>  
> +	no_virt_spin	[RISC-V] Disable virt_spin_lock in KVM guest to use
> +			native_queued_spinlock when the nopvspin option is enabled.
> +			This would help vcpu=pcpu scenarios.
> +
>  	novmcoredd	[KNL,KDUMP]
>  			Disable device dump. Device dump allows drivers to
>  			append dump data to vmcore so you can collect driver
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> index 501e06e52078..e0233b3d7a5f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
>  	SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MIMPID,
>  };
>  
> +enum sbi_ext_base_impl_id {
> +	SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_BBL = 0,
> +	SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_OPENSBI,
> +	SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_XVISOR,
> +	SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM,
> +};
> +
>  enum sbi_ext_time_fid {
>  	SBI_EXT_TIME_SET_TIMER = 0,
>  };
> @@ -269,6 +276,7 @@ int sbi_console_getchar(void);
>  long sbi_get_mvendorid(void);
>  long sbi_get_marchid(void);
>  long sbi_get_mimpid(void);
> +long sbi_get_firmware_id(void);
>  void sbi_set_timer(uint64_t stime_value);
>  void sbi_shutdown(void);
>  void sbi_send_ipi(unsigned int cpu);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 8ea0fee80652..6b38d6616f14 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,28 @@
>  #define __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +/*
> + * The KVM guests fall back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks
> + * have horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues. The virt_spin_lock_key
> + * would shortcut for the queued_spin_lock_slowpath() function that allow
> + * virt_spin_lock to hijack it.
> + */
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
> +
> +#define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
> +static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +{
> +	if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	do {
> +		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
> +			cpu_relax();
> +	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS	(1 << 9)
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> index 88eea3a99ee0..cdd45edc8db4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static inline long sbi_get_spec_version(void)
>  	return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION);
>  }
>  
> -static inline long sbi_get_firmware_id(void)
> +long sbi_get_firmware_id(void)
>  {
>  	return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 0f084f037651..c57d15b05160 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/early_ioremap.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -283,16 +284,43 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(combo_qspinlock_key);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(combo_qspinlock_key);
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +static bool no_virt_spin_key = false;

I suggest no _key, also there is no need for "= false".
To be consistent with enable_qspinlock, I also suggest
adding __ro_after_init:

static bool no_virt_spin __ro_after_init; 



> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
> +
> +static int __init no_virt_spin_setup(char *p)
> +{
> +	no_virt_spin_key = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("no_virt_spin", no_virt_spin_setup);
> +
> +static void __init virt_spin_lock_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (sbi_get_firmware_id() != SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM ||
> +	    no_virt_spin_key)
> +		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
> +	else
> +		pr_info("Enable virt_spin_lock\n");
> +}
> +#endif
> +

A new virt_no_spin kernel parameter was introduced, but without 
CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS it will silently fail.

I would suggest an #else clause here with a function to print an error / 
warning message about no_virt_spin being invalid in this scenario.
It will probably help future debugging.


>  static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
> -	if (!enable_qspinlock_key) {
> +	if (!enable_qspinlock_key &&
> +	    (sbi_get_firmware_id() != SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM)) {
>  		static_branch_disable(&combo_qspinlock_key);
>  		pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
>  	} else {
>  		pr_info("Queued spinlock: enabled\n");
>  	}
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +	virt_spin_lock_init();
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

I am probably missing something out, but it looks to me that this patch is 
causing 2 different changes:
1 - Enabling no_virt_spin parameter
2 - Disabling queued spinlocks for some firmware_id

Wouldn't be better to split those changes in multiple patches? 
Or am I missing the point on why they need to be together?

Thanks!
Leo


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-14  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-10  8:28 [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 01/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-09-11 19:05   ` Leonardo Brás
2023-09-13  1:55     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  7:59       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 02/17] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h guoren
2023-09-13  8:15   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 03/17] riscv: Use Zicbop in arch_xchg when available guoren
2023-09-13  8:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 12:36     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-16  1:25       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:34         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:13           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  7:53             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:38               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 13:47   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15  8:22     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15 11:07       ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:26         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:22           ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:42             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-16  0:05               ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 20:32         ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 14:25   ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-14 14:47     ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 11:37       ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-15 12:14         ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-15 12:53           ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-31  8:29   ` guoren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 04/17] locking/qspinlock: Improve xchg_tail for number of cpus >= 16k guoren
2023-09-11  2:35   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-11  3:09     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 13:03       ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13  8:55           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 12:52             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 13:06               ` Waiman Long
2023-09-14  3:45                 ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  8:28 ` [PATCH V11 05/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-09-13 20:28   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:46     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  9:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-15  2:10         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-15  9:08           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:02             ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:20               ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 06/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2023-09-10 11:06   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 20:37     ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-13 20:49       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14  4:49         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  7:17           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 07/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce qspinlock param for command line guoren
2023-09-11 15:22   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 15:34   ` Waiman Long
2023-09-12  1:08     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-14  7:32       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-14 17:23         ` Waiman Long
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 08/17] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for KVM guest guoren
2023-09-14  8:02   ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2023-09-17 15:12     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:30       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-19  8:04         ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19 14:40           ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 09/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-09-14  8:32   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:15     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:34       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 10/17] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Enable qspinlock for T-HEAD processors guoren
2023-09-14  9:36   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 11/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  5:42   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 14:58     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:43       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 12/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-09-15  6:05   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:03     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:44       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 13/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-09-15  6:23   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-17 15:06     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-19  5:45       ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 14/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-09-15  6:25   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 15/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-09-15  6:33   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 16/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-09-15  6:46   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH V11 17/17] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Implement kvm_sbi_ext_pvlock_kick_cpu() guoren
2023-09-15  6:52   ` Leonardo Bras
2023-09-10  8:58 ` [PATCH V11 00/17] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:16   ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:20     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10  9:31     ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-10  9:49       ` Guo Ren
2023-09-10 19:45         ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-11  3:36           ` Guo Ren
2023-09-11 12:52             ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12  1:33               ` Guo Ren
2023-09-12  8:07                 ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-12 10:58                   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-06 20:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-11-12  4:23   ` Guo Ren
2023-11-13 10:19     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQK9-tn2MepXlY1u@redhat.com \
    --to=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).