From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@intel.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf test: Rerun failed metrics with longer workload
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 09:26:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230609162625.100897-4-weilin.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609162625.100897-1-weilin.wang@intel.com>
Rerun failed metrics with longer workload to avoid false failure because
sometimes metric value test fails when running in very short amount of
time.
Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
---
.../tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py | 129 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py
index e59941089350..fd39b50371d0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py
@@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ class Validator:
self.rulefname = rulefname
self.reportfname = reportfname
self.rules = None
- self.collectlist=metrics
- self.metrics = set(metrics)
+ self.collectlist:str = metrics
+ self.metrics = self.__set_metrics(metrics)
+ self.skiplist = set()
self.tolerance = t
self.workloads = [x for x in workload.split(",") if x]
@@ -41,6 +42,12 @@ class Validator:
self.debug = debug
self.fullrulefname = fullrulefname
+ def __set_metrics(self, metrics=''):
+ if metrics != '':
+ return set(metrics.split(","))
+ else:
+ return set()
+
def read_json(self, filename: str) -> dict:
try:
with open(Path(filename).resolve(), "r") as f:
@@ -113,7 +120,7 @@ class Validator:
All future test(s) on this metric will fail.
@param name: name of the metric
- @returns: list with value found in self.results; list is empty when not value found.
+ @returns: list with value found in self.results; list is empty when value is not found.
"""
results = []
data = self.results[ridx] if ridx in self.results else self.results[0]
@@ -123,7 +130,6 @@ class Validator:
elif name.replace('.', '1').isdigit():
results.append(float(name))
else:
- self.errlist.append("Metric '%s' is not collected or the value format is incorrect"%(name))
self.ignoremetrics.add(name)
return results
@@ -138,27 +144,32 @@ class Validator:
Failure: when metric value is negative or not provided.
Metrics with negative value will be added into the self.failtests['PositiveValueTest'] and self.ignoremetrics.
"""
- negmetric = set()
- missmetric = set()
+ negmetric = dict()
pcnt = 0
tcnt = 0
+ rerun = list()
for name, val in self.get_results().items():
- if val is None or val == '':
- missmetric.add(name)
- self.errlist.append("Metric '%s' is not collected"%(name))
- elif val < 0:
- negmetric.add("{0}(={1:.4f})".format(name, val))
- self.collectlist[0].append(name)
+ if val < 0:
+ negmetric[name] = val
+ rerun.append(name)
else:
pcnt += 1
tcnt += 1
+ if len(rerun) > 0:
+ second_results = dict()
+ self.second_test(rerun, second_results)
+ for name, val in second_results.items():
+ if name not in negmetric: continue
+ if val >= 0:
+ del negmetric[name]
+ pcnt += 1
self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Total Tests'] = tcnt
self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Passed Tests'] = pcnt
- if len(negmetric) or len(missmetric)> 0:
- self.ignoremetrics.update(negmetric)
- self.ignoremetrics.update(missmetric)
- self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'NegativeValue':list(negmetric), 'MissingValue':list(missmetric)})
+ if len(negmetric.keys()):
+ self.ignoremetrics.update(negmetric.keys())
+ negmessage = ["{0}(={1:.4f})".format(name, val) for name, val in negmetric.items()]
+ self.failtests['PositiveValueTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'NegativeValue': negmessage})
return
@@ -259,21 +270,36 @@ class Validator:
metrics = rule['Metrics']
passcnt = 0
totalcnt = 0
- faillist = []
+ faillist = list()
+ failures = dict()
+ rerun = list()
for m in metrics:
totalcnt += 1
result = self.get_value(m['Name'])
- if len(result) > 0 and self.check_bound(result[0], lbv, ubv, t):
+ if len(result) > 0 and self.check_bound(result[0], lbv, ubv, t) or m['Name'] in self.skiplist:
passcnt += 1
else:
- faillist.append({'MetricName':m['Name'], 'CollectedValue':result})
- self.collectlist[0].append(m['Name'])
+ failures[m['Name']] = result
+ rerun.append(m['Name'])
+
+ if len(rerun) > 0:
+ second_results = dict()
+ self.second_test(rerun, second_results)
+ for name, val in second_results.items():
+ if name not in failures: continue
+ if self.check_bound(val, lbv, ubv, t):
+ passcnt += 1
+ del failures[name]
+ else:
+ failures[name] = val
+ self.results[0][name] = val
self.totalcnt += totalcnt
self.passedcnt += passcnt
self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Total Tests'] += totalcnt
self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Passed Tests'] += passcnt
- if len(faillist) != 0:
+ if len(failures.keys()) != 0:
+ faillist = [{'MetricName':name, 'CollectedValue':val} for name, val in failures.items()]
self.failtests['SingleMetricTest']['Failed Tests'].append({'RuleIndex':rule['RuleIndex'],
'RangeLower': rule['RangeLower'],
'RangeUpper': rule['RangeUpper'],
@@ -316,7 +342,7 @@ class Validator:
return True
# Start of Collector and Converter
- def convert(self, data: list, idx: int):
+ def convert(self, data: list, metricvalues:dict):
"""
Convert collected metric data from the -j output to dict of {metric_name:value}.
"""
@@ -326,20 +352,29 @@ class Validator:
if "metric-unit" in result and result["metric-unit"] != "(null)" and result["metric-unit"] != "":
name = result["metric-unit"].split(" ")[1] if len(result["metric-unit"].split(" ")) > 1 \
else result["metric-unit"]
- if idx not in self.results: self.results[idx] = dict()
- self.results[idx][name.lower()] = result["metric-value"]
+ metricvalues[name.lower()] = result["metric-value"]
except ValueError as error:
continue
return
- def collect_perf(self, data_file: str, workload: str):
+ def _run_perf(self, metric, workload: str):
+ tool = 'perf'
+ command = [tool, 'stat', '-j', '-M', f"{metric}", "-a"]
+ wl = workload.split()
+ command.extend(wl)
+ print(" ".join(command))
+ cmd = subprocess.run(command, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, encoding='utf-8')
+ data = [x+'}' for x in cmd.stderr.split('}\n') if x]
+ return data
+
+
+ def collect_perf(self, workload: str):
"""
Collect metric data with "perf stat -M" on given workload with -a and -j.
"""
self.results = dict()
- tool = 'perf'
print(f"Starting perf collection")
- print(f"Workload: {workload}")
+ print(f"Long workload: {workload}")
collectlist = dict()
if self.collectlist != "":
collectlist[0] = {x for x in self.collectlist.split(",")}
@@ -353,17 +388,20 @@ class Validator:
collectlist[rule["RuleIndex"]] = [",".join(list(set(metrics)))]
for idx, metrics in collectlist.items():
- if idx == 0: wl = "sleep 0.5".split()
- else: wl = workload.split()
+ if idx == 0: wl = "true"
+ else: wl = workload
for metric in metrics:
- command = [tool, 'stat', '-j', '-M', f"{metric}", "-a"]
- command.extend(wl)
- print(" ".join(command))
- cmd = subprocess.run(command, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, encoding='utf-8')
- data = [x+'}' for x in cmd.stderr.split('}\n') if x]
- self.convert(data, idx)
- self.collectlist = dict()
- self.collectlist[0] = list()
+ data = self._run_perf(metric, wl)
+ if idx not in self.results: self.results[idx] = dict()
+ self.convert(data, self.results[idx])
+ return
+
+ def second_test(self, collectlist, second_results):
+ workload = self.workloads[self.wlidx]
+ for metric in collectlist:
+ data = self._run_perf(metric, workload)
+ self.convert(data, second_results)
+
# End of Collector and Converter
# Start of Rule Generator
@@ -381,7 +419,7 @@ class Validator:
if 'MetricName' not in m:
print("Warning: no metric name")
continue
- name = m['MetricName']
+ name = m['MetricName'].lower()
self.metrics.add(name)
if 'ScaleUnit' in m and (m['ScaleUnit'] == '1%' or m['ScaleUnit'] == '100%'):
self.pctgmetrics.add(name.lower())
@@ -391,14 +429,12 @@ class Validator:
return
- def remove_unsupported_rules(self, rules, skiplist: set = None):
- for m in skiplist:
- self.metrics.discard(m)
+ def remove_unsupported_rules(self, rules):
new_rules = []
for rule in rules:
add_rule = True
for m in rule["Metrics"]:
- if m["Name"] not in self.metrics:
+ if m["Name"] in self.skiplist or m["Name"] not in self.metrics:
add_rule = False
break
if add_rule:
@@ -415,15 +451,15 @@ class Validator:
"""
data = self.read_json(self.rulefname)
rules = data['RelationshipRules']
- skiplist = set(data['SkipList'])
- self.rules = self.remove_unsupported_rules(rules, skiplist)
+ self.skiplist = set([name.lower() for name in data['SkipList']])
+ self.rules = self.remove_unsupported_rules(rules)
pctgrule = {'RuleIndex':0,
'TestType':'SingleMetricTest',
'RangeLower':'0',
'RangeUpper': '100',
'ErrorThreshold': self.tolerance,
'Description':'Metrics in percent unit have value with in [0, 100]',
- 'Metrics': [{'Name': m} for m in self.pctgmetrics]}
+ 'Metrics': [{'Name': m.lower()} for m in self.pctgmetrics]}
self.rules.append(pctgrule)
# Re-index all rules to avoid repeated RuleIndex
@@ -479,8 +515,9 @@ class Validator:
self.parse_perf_metrics()
self.create_rules()
for i in range(0, len(self.workloads)):
+ self.wlidx = i
self._init_data()
- self.collect_perf(self.datafname, self.workloads[i])
+ self.collect_perf(self.workloads[i])
# Run positive value test
self.pos_val_test()
for r in self.rules:
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 16:26 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add metric value validation test Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: " Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf test: Add skip list for metrics known would fail Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` Weilin Wang [this message]
2023-06-13 0:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add metric value validation test Ian Rogers
2023-06-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 " Weilin Wang
2023-06-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf test: " Weilin Wang
2023-06-16 7:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-18 17:43 ` Wang, Weilin
2023-06-19 4:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf test: Add skip list for metrics known would fail Weilin Wang
2023-06-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf test: Rerun failed metrics with longer workload Weilin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230609162625.100897-4-weilin.wang@intel.com \
--to=weilin.wang@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samantha.alt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).