LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@intel.com>,
	Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
	Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf test: Add metric value validation test
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:32:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc18bc42-3df8-30c9-10ff-8a4ba3d3d9f6@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230614203824.2895333-2-weilin.wang@intel.com>

Hi,

> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..65a15c65eea7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_values.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# perf metrics value validation
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +if [ "x$PYTHON" == "x" ]
> +then
> +	if which python3 > /dev/null
> +	then
> +		PYTHON=python3
> +	else
> +		echo Skipping test, python3 not detected please set environment variable PYTHON.
> +		exit 2
> +	fi
> +fi
> +
> +grep -q Intel /proc/cpuinfo || (echo Skipping non-Intel; exit 2)

This check doesn't seem to be working. On my Zen3 AMD machine:

  $ sudo ./perf test -vvv 105
  105: perf metrics value validation                                   :
  --- start ---
  test child forked, pid 518035
  Skipping non-Intel
  Launch python validation script ./tests/shell/lib/perf_metric_validation.py
  Output will be stored in: /tmp/__perf_test.program.tnPoW
  Starting perf collection
  ...

Interestingly, it passes :)

  ...
  Test validation finished. Final report:
  [
      {
          "Workload": "perf bench futex hash -r 2 -s",
          "Report": {
              "Metric Validation Statistics": {
                  "Total Rule Count": 2,
                  "Passed Rule Count": 2
              },
              "Tests in Category": {
                  "PositiveValueTest": {
                      "Total Tests": 12,
                      "Passed Tests": 12,
                      "Failed Tests": []
                  },
                  "RelationshipTest": {
                      "Total Tests": 0,
                      "Passed Tests": 0,
                      "Failed Tests": []
                  },
                  "SingleMetricTest": {
                      "Total Tests": 2,
                      "Passed Tests": 2,
                      "Failed Tests": []
                  }
              },
              "Errors": []
          }
      }
  ]
  test child finished with 0
  ---- end ----
  perf metrics value validation: Ok

I haven't yet investigated whether it's genuine or false positive.

Thanks,
Ravi

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-16  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-09 16:26 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add metric value validation test Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: " Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf test: Add skip list for metrics known would fail Weilin Wang
2023-06-09 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf test: Rerun failed metrics with longer workload Weilin Wang
2023-06-13  0:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add metric value validation test Ian Rogers
2023-06-14 20:38   ` [PATCH v3 " Weilin Wang
2023-06-14 20:38     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf test: " Weilin Wang
2023-06-16  7:02       ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2023-06-18 17:43         ` Wang, Weilin
2023-06-19  4:20           ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-14 20:38     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf test: Add skip list for metrics known would fail Weilin Wang
2023-06-14 20:38     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf test: Rerun failed metrics with longer workload Weilin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc18bc42-3df8-30c9-10ff-8a4ba3d3d9f6@amd.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=samantha.alt@intel.com \
    --cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).