From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:16:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714131628.0c87f0a4@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714110819.GU11162@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().
>
> > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.
>
> > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> > depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.
>
> What is the dependency for the enable patch?
Oh, indeed. This patch has no dependency on the PWM changes. I'll send
it on its own then.
Thanks,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie-Fm38FmjxZ/leoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski
<j.anaszewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Alexandre Courbot
<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:16:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714131628.0c87f0a4@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714110819.GU11162-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().
>
> > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.
>
> > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> > depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.
>
> What is the dependency for the enable patch?
Oh, indeed. This patch has no dependency on the PWM changes. I'll send
it on its own then.
Thanks,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:16:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714131628.0c87f0a4@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714110819.GU11162@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().
>
> > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.
>
> > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> > depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.
>
> What is the dependency for the enable patch?
Oh, indeed. This patch has no dependency on the PWM changes. I'll send
it on its own then.
Thanks,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 204+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 8:21 [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] pwm: fix pwm_get_period and pwm_get_duty_cycle prototypes Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] pwm: add pwm_get_polarity helper function Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] pwm: make use of pwm_get_xxx helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to " Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] pwm: declare a default PWM state Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/15] pwm: add informations about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-03 8:43 ` [PATCH] " Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03 8:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03 8:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150714131628.0c87f0a4@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.