From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720091648.625a3dbd@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Hi Thierry,
I'd like to send a new version of this series fixing the problems
reported by Heiko, but I remember you were not happy with the naming
convention I have chosen for the atomic update function.
Could you have a quick look at this series (I'm not asking for a
detailed review) and let me know which things you'd like me to rename.
Best Regards,
Boris
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:21:46 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capability
> to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
> duty and polarity) in one go.
>
> This implementation is still experimental, and I may have missed some key
> aspect, so any feedback are welcome.
>
> Also note that I haven't protected the state update with any locking.
> That's because the existing config does not protect against concurrent
> access to a requested PWM device (see the pwm_config implementation).
> I guess the PWM framework assume the user will implement the proper locking
> scheme if it has to concurrently access the device.
>
> The 5 first patches prepare the addition of the pwm_state concept, which
> will be used to allow atomic updates.
> The following patches introduce the pwm_state struct, initial state
> retrieval and atomic update concepts.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 are showing how one can implement the initial state
> retrieval and atomic update features in a PWM driver (in this specific
> case I implemented it in the rockchip driver).
>
> The last 2 patches are making use of those changes to improve the
> pwm-regulator driver (initializing the regulator state based on the
> initial PWM state).
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> Boris Brezillon (15):
> pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper
> pwm: fix pwm_get_period and pwm_get_duty_cycle prototypes
> pwm: add pwm_get_polarity helper function
> pwm: make use of pwm_get_xxx helpers where appropriate
> pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts
> pwm: define a new pwm_state struct
> pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct
> backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period
> pwm: declare a default PWM state
> pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra
> pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
> pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval
> pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update
> regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled
> methods
> regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field
>
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 7 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 5 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 3 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c | 10 +--
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 13 ++--
> drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 60 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 4 +-
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 6 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pwm.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 21 files changed, 380 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720091648.625a3dbd@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Hi Thierry,
I'd like to send a new version of this series fixing the problems
reported by Heiko, but I remember you were not happy with the naming
convention I have chosen for the atomic update function.
Could you have a quick look at this series (I'm not asking for a
detailed review) and let me know which things you'd like me to rename.
Best Regards,
Boris
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:21:46 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capability
> to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
> duty and polarity) in one go.
>
> This implementation is still experimental, and I may have missed some key
> aspect, so any feedback are welcome.
>
> Also note that I haven't protected the state update with any locking.
> That's because the existing config does not protect against concurrent
> access to a requested PWM device (see the pwm_config implementation).
> I guess the PWM framework assume the user will implement the proper locking
> scheme if it has to concurrently access the device.
>
> The 5 first patches prepare the addition of the pwm_state concept, which
> will be used to allow atomic updates.
> The following patches introduce the pwm_state struct, initial state
> retrieval and atomic update concepts.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 are showing how one can implement the initial state
> retrieval and atomic update features in a PWM driver (in this specific
> case I implemented it in the rockchip driver).
>
> The last 2 patches are making use of those changes to improve the
> pwm-regulator driver (initializing the regulator state based on the
> initial PWM state).
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> Boris Brezillon (15):
> pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper
> pwm: fix pwm_get_period and pwm_get_duty_cycle prototypes
> pwm: add pwm_get_polarity helper function
> pwm: make use of pwm_get_xxx helpers where appropriate
> pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts
> pwm: define a new pwm_state struct
> pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct
> backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period
> pwm: declare a default PWM state
> pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra
> pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
> pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval
> pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update
> regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled
> methods
> regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field
>
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 7 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 5 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 3 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c | 10 +--
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 13 ++--
> drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 60 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 4 +-
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 6 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pwm.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 21 files changed, 380 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720091648.625a3dbd@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Hi Thierry,
I'd like to send a new version of this series fixing the problems
reported by Heiko, but I remember you were not happy with the naming
convention I have chosen for the atomic update function.
Could you have a quick look at this series (I'm not asking for a
detailed review) and let me know which things you'd like me to rename.
Best Regards,
Boris
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:21:46 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capability
> to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
> duty and polarity) in one go.
>
> This implementation is still experimental, and I may have missed some key
> aspect, so any feedback are welcome.
>
> Also note that I haven't protected the state update with any locking.
> That's because the existing config does not protect against concurrent
> access to a requested PWM device (see the pwm_config implementation).
> I guess the PWM framework assume the user will implement the proper locking
> scheme if it has to concurrently access the device.
>
> The 5 first patches prepare the addition of the pwm_state concept, which
> will be used to allow atomic updates.
> The following patches introduce the pwm_state struct, initial state
> retrieval and atomic update concepts.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 are showing how one can implement the initial state
> retrieval and atomic update features in a PWM driver (in this specific
> case I implemented it in the rockchip driver).
>
> The last 2 patches are making use of those changes to improve the
> pwm-regulator driver (initializing the regulator state based on the
> initial PWM state).
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> Boris Brezillon (15):
> pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper
> pwm: fix pwm_get_period and pwm_get_duty_cycle prototypes
> pwm: add pwm_get_polarity helper function
> pwm: make use of pwm_get_xxx helpers where appropriate
> pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts
> pwm: define a new pwm_state struct
> pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct
> backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period
> pwm: declare a default PWM state
> pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra
> pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
> pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval
> pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update
> regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled
> methods
> regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field
>
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 7 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 5 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 3 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c | 10 +--
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 6 +-
> drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 13 ++--
> drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 60 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 4 +-
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 6 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pwm.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 21 files changed, 380 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 204+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 8:21 [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] pwm: fix pwm_get_period and pwm_get_duty_cycle prototypes Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:50 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] pwm: add pwm_get_polarity helper function Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] pwm: make use of pwm_get_xxx helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 6:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:22 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to " Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:11 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:36 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] pwm: declare a default PWM state Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:01 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 8:59 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 10:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-14 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-01 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/15] pwm: add informations about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-03 8:43 ` [PATCH] " Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03 8:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-03 8:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-01 21:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-02 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-20 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150720091648.625a3dbd@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.