All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	users@linux.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Github PR bot questions
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:16:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617151659.GF5067@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617145728.nahkvtxapozccm6c@nitro.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:57:28AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:09:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > Because I don't waste my time on the kind of crap that comes from
> > github.  If you build a separate webinterface that allows anyone to send
> > a proper series from a git tree that is all fine.  But github is toxic.

> Won't this just end up reimplementing a lot of stuff that we already get "for
> free" from Github and other forges? Yes, I know Github is proprietary, but so
> are many SMTP gateways used to send the patch series. I don't see how what
> the GH bot would do is different from:

I think part of the concern here is that people have some standard
expectations for how projects they work with on Github are going to
function so if people end up using Github to submit patches we may end
up with some culture and process mismatches which could cause issues.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16 17:18 RFC: Github PR bot questions Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 17:24 ` Drew DeVault
2021-06-16 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2021-06-16 17:55   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:13     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 17:07       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found] ` <CAJhbpm_BgbSx581HU0mTCkcE28n_hRx=tv74az_mE2VBmPtrVA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-06-16 18:05   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:11 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 18:22   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:38     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 20:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-06-17 15:11   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Willy Tarreau
2021-06-16 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-17 15:09   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 21:11 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 21:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-16 21:59     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 22:33   ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17 14:18     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:27       ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17  6:52   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  8:20     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  8:55       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  9:33         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  9:52           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 14:33         ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:24           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17 15:38             ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:02     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:47   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-17 15:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 15:53         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 17:15     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17  6:37 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  7:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-17 14:59   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17  8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17  8:33   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17  9:52     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17 10:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:57         ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:16           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-06-17 15:24             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 16:36               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 18:43               ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 15:31             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-17 17:06               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-17 22:35                 ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17 14:23       ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 20:42 ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210617151659.GF5067@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.