From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] :staging: rtl8723bs: Remove useless led_blink_hdl()
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:00:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414070025.GB6048@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2418632.vfNx7fMs9o@linux.local>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:33:48AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 7:21:50 AM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:08:32PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:48:44 PM CEST Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco
> wrote:
> > > > > 1) The driver doesn't call that function from anywhere else than
> > > > > the
> > > > > macro. 2) You have explained that the macro add its symbol to a
> > > > > slot
> > > > > in an array that would shift all the subsequent elements down if
> > > > > that
> > > > > macro is not used exactly in the line where it is.
> > > > > 3) Dan Carpenter said that that array is full of null functions (or
> > > > > empty slots?).
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless that function is called anonymously dereferencing its
> > > > > address
> > > > > from the position it occupies in the array, I'm not able to see
> > > > > what
> > > > > else means can any caller use.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know I have much less experience than you with C: what can go
> > > > > wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Here's where the driver calls that function:
> > > >
> > > > $ git grep wlancmds drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/
> > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c:static struct cmd_hdl
> > > > wlancmds[] = { drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c:
> > > > if
> > > > (pcmd->cmdcode < ARRAY_SIZE(wlancmds)) {
> > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c:
> > > > cmd_hdl
> > > > = wlancmds[pcmd->cmdcode].h2cfuns;
> > >
> > > OK, I had imagined an anonymous call from its location in the array (as
> > > I wrote in the last phrase of my message). However, I thought that it
> > > could have been an improbable possibility, not a real one.
> > >
> > > Linux uses a lot of interesting ideas that newcomers like me should
> > > learn. Things here are trickier than they appear at first sight.
> >
> > One trick would be to build the Smatch cross function database.
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/smatch/msg00568.html
> >
> > Then you could do:
> >
> > $ ~/path/to/smatch_data/db/smdb.py led_blink_hdl
> > file | caller | function | type | parameter | key | value |
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | rtw_cmd_thread |
> > rtw_cmd_thread ptr cmd_hdl | INTERNAL | -1 | |
> > uchar(*)(struct adapter*, uchar*)
> > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c | rtw_cmd_thread |
> > rtw_cmd_thread ptr cmd_hdl | INTERNAL | -1 | |
> > uchar(*)(struct adapter*, uchar*)
> > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c | rtw_cmd_thread |
> > rtw_cmd_thread ptr cmd_hdl | BUF_SIZE | 1 | pbuf |
> > 1,4,6,8,12,14,16,19-20,23-24,48,740,884,892,900,960
> >
> >
> > Which says that led_blink_hdl() is called as a function pointer called
> > "cmd_hdl" from rtw_cmd_thread().
> >
> > Hm... It says it can be called from either rtw_cmd_thread() function
> > (the rtl8723bs or rtl8188eu version) which is not ideal. But also
> > basically harmless so whatever...
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
> Nice tool, thanks. I'll surely use it when it is needed to find out which
> callers use a function pointer.
>
> However I cannot see how it can help in this context. That function *does*
> something, even if I cannot understand why someone needs a function to test
> the initialization of a pointer. Furthermore it is actually called by
> rtw_cmd_thread() (as you found out by using smatch) that expect one of the
> two possible values that led_blink_hdl() returns.
>
> That said, what trick could I use for the purpose of getting rid of that
> function? At this point I'm not sure it could be made.
If you look at how this is called:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
449 memcpy(pcmdbuf, pcmd->parmbuf, pcmd->cmdsz);
450
451 if (pcmd->cmdcode < ARRAY_SIZE(wlancmds)) {
452 cmd_hdl = wlancmds[pcmd->cmdcode].h2cfuns;
453
454 if (cmd_hdl) {
455 ret = cmd_hdl(pcmd->padapter, pcmdbuf);
^^^^^^^
456 pcmd->res = ret;
457 }
458
459 pcmdpriv->cmd_seq++;
460 } else {
461 pcmd->res = H2C_PARAMETERS_ERROR;
462 }
463
464 cmd_hdl = NULL;
The led_blink_hdl() function returns success if "pcmdbuf" is non-NULL
and fail if it's NULL. "pcmdbuf" is never supposed to be NULL. (The
"supposed" caveat is because there may be a race in rtw_sdio_if1_init()
which briefly allows a NULL "pcmdbuf", but that is an unrelated bug).
Anyway, there is no point to the led_blink_hdl() function. Likely
they intended it to do something but never got around to implementing
it. Just delete it.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 15:59 [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] :staging: rtl8723bs: Remove useless led_blink_hdl() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 16:04 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 16:19 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 16:27 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 16:47 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 18:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-13 18:30 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 18:57 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 19:16 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 19:25 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 19:45 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-13 20:08 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 5:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 6:33 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 7:00 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-04-14 7:59 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 7:40 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-14 7:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-13 16:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-14 11:52 [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: " Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 12:00 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-14 12:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-04-14 13:27 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 13:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 15:36 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414070025.GB6048@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).