From: netdev@kapio-technology.com
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/6] net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:13:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d884212b8df03e5cf03c4b2e5ea3e3d@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708085403.sk7znfad3x2mnxeh@skbuf>
On 2022-07-08 10:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> struct dsa_db db;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ struct dsa_switchdev_event_work {
>> unsigned char addr[ETH_ALEN];
>> u16 vid;
>> bool host_addr;
>> + bool is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>> };
>>
>> enum dsa_standalone_event {
>> @@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_msti(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> const struct switchdev_vlan_msti *msti);
>> int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int new_mtu);
>> int dsa_port_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> - u16 vid);
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked);
>
> drop
>
>> int dsa_port_fdb_del(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> u16 vid);
>> int dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
>> index 3738f2d40a0b..8bdac9aabe5d 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static void dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(const
>> struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid)
>> struct net_device *brport_dev = dsa_port_to_bridge_port(dp);
>> struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info = {
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> };
>>
>> /* When the port becomes standalone it has already left the bridge.
>> @@ -950,12 +951,13 @@ int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int
>> new_mtu)
>> }
>>
>> int dsa_port_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> - u16 vid)
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked)
>
> drop
>
>> {
>> struct dsa_notifier_fdb_info info = {
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = is_locked,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = {
>> .type = DSA_DB_BRIDGE,
>> .bridge = *dp->bridge,
>> @@ -979,6 +981,7 @@ int dsa_port_fdb_del(struct dsa_port *dp, const
>> unsigned char *addr,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = {
>> .type = DSA_DB_BRIDGE,
>> .bridge = *dp->bridge,
>> @@ -999,6 +1002,7 @@ static int dsa_port_host_fdb_add(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = db,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -1050,6 +1054,7 @@ static int dsa_port_host_fdb_del(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = db,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>> index 801a5d445833..905b15e4eab9 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>> @@ -2784,6 +2784,7 @@ static void
>> dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> container_of(work, struct dsa_switchdev_event_work, work);
>> const unsigned char *addr = switchdev_work->addr;
>> struct net_device *dev = switchdev_work->dev;
>> + bool is_locked = switchdev_work->is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>> u16 vid = switchdev_work->vid;
>> struct dsa_switch *ds;
>> struct dsa_port *dp;
>> @@ -2799,7 +2800,7 @@ static void
>> dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> else if (dp->lag)
>> err = dsa_port_lag_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid);
>> else
>> - err = dsa_port_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid);
>> + err = dsa_port_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid, is_locked);
>
> drop
>
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(ds->dev,
>> "port %d failed to add %pM vid %d to fdb: %d\n",
>> @@ -2907,6 +2908,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_fdb_event(struct net_device
>> *dev,
>> ether_addr_copy(switchdev_work->addr, fdb_info->addr);
>> switchdev_work->vid = fdb_info->vid;
>> switchdev_work->host_addr = host_addr;
>> + switchdev_work->is_locked = fdb_info->is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>>
>> dsa_schedule_work(&switchdev_work->work);
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
>> index 2b56218fc57c..32b1e7ac6373 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/switch.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int dsa_port_do_mdb_del(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> }
>>
>> static int dsa_port_do_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned
>> char *addr,
>> - u16 vid, struct dsa_db db)
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked, struct dsa_db db)
>
> drop
>
>> {
>> struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>> struct dsa_mac_addr *a;
>> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_host_fdb_add(struct
>> dsa_switch *ds,
>> dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
>> if (dsa_port_host_address_match(dp, info->dp)) {
>> err = dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid,
>> - info->db);
>> + false, info->db);
>
> drop
>
>> if (err)
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_fdb_add(struct dsa_switch
>> *ds,
>> if (!ds->ops->port_fdb_add)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> - return dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid, info->db);
>> + return dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid,
>> info->is_locked, info->db);
>
> drop
>
>> }
>>
>> static int dsa_switch_fdb_del(struct dsa_switch *ds,
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
Hi Vladimir and Ido,
I can either ignore locked entries early or late in the dsa/switchdev
layers.
If I ignore early, I think it should be in br_switchdev_fdb_notify() in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c.
If I ignore late, I would think that it should be jut before sending it
to the driver(s), e.g. in dsa_port_do_fdb_add() in net/dsa/switch.c.
There is of course pros and cons of both options, but if the flag is
never to be sent to the driver, then it should be ignored early.
If ignored late most of this patch should not be dropped.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: netdev@kapio-technology.com
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 net-next 2/6] net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:13:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d884212b8df03e5cf03c4b2e5ea3e3d@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708085403.sk7znfad3x2mnxeh@skbuf>
On 2022-07-08 10:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> struct dsa_db db;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ struct dsa_switchdev_event_work {
>> unsigned char addr[ETH_ALEN];
>> u16 vid;
>> bool host_addr;
>> + bool is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>> };
>>
>> enum dsa_standalone_event {
>> @@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_msti(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> const struct switchdev_vlan_msti *msti);
>> int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int new_mtu);
>> int dsa_port_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> - u16 vid);
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked);
>
> drop
>
>> int dsa_port_fdb_del(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> u16 vid);
>> int dsa_port_standalone_host_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
>> index 3738f2d40a0b..8bdac9aabe5d 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static void dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(const
>> struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid)
>> struct net_device *brport_dev = dsa_port_to_bridge_port(dp);
>> struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info = {
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> };
>>
>> /* When the port becomes standalone it has already left the bridge.
>> @@ -950,12 +951,13 @@ int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int
>> new_mtu)
>> }
>>
>> int dsa_port_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
>> - u16 vid)
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked)
>
> drop
>
>> {
>> struct dsa_notifier_fdb_info info = {
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = is_locked,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = {
>> .type = DSA_DB_BRIDGE,
>> .bridge = *dp->bridge,
>> @@ -979,6 +981,7 @@ int dsa_port_fdb_del(struct dsa_port *dp, const
>> unsigned char *addr,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = {
>> .type = DSA_DB_BRIDGE,
>> .bridge = *dp->bridge,
>> @@ -999,6 +1002,7 @@ static int dsa_port_host_fdb_add(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = db,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -1050,6 +1054,7 @@ static int dsa_port_host_fdb_del(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> .dp = dp,
>> .addr = addr,
>> .vid = vid,
>> + .is_locked = false,
>
> drop
>
>> .db = db,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>> index 801a5d445833..905b15e4eab9 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>> @@ -2784,6 +2784,7 @@ static void
>> dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> container_of(work, struct dsa_switchdev_event_work, work);
>> const unsigned char *addr = switchdev_work->addr;
>> struct net_device *dev = switchdev_work->dev;
>> + bool is_locked = switchdev_work->is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>> u16 vid = switchdev_work->vid;
>> struct dsa_switch *ds;
>> struct dsa_port *dp;
>> @@ -2799,7 +2800,7 @@ static void
>> dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> else if (dp->lag)
>> err = dsa_port_lag_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid);
>> else
>> - err = dsa_port_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid);
>> + err = dsa_port_fdb_add(dp, addr, vid, is_locked);
>
> drop
>
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(ds->dev,
>> "port %d failed to add %pM vid %d to fdb: %d\n",
>> @@ -2907,6 +2908,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_fdb_event(struct net_device
>> *dev,
>> ether_addr_copy(switchdev_work->addr, fdb_info->addr);
>> switchdev_work->vid = fdb_info->vid;
>> switchdev_work->host_addr = host_addr;
>> + switchdev_work->is_locked = fdb_info->is_locked;
>
> drop
>
>>
>> dsa_schedule_work(&switchdev_work->work);
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
>> index 2b56218fc57c..32b1e7ac6373 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/switch.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int dsa_port_do_mdb_del(struct dsa_port
>> *dp,
>> }
>>
>> static int dsa_port_do_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned
>> char *addr,
>> - u16 vid, struct dsa_db db)
>> + u16 vid, bool is_locked, struct dsa_db db)
>
> drop
>
>> {
>> struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>> struct dsa_mac_addr *a;
>> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_host_fdb_add(struct
>> dsa_switch *ds,
>> dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
>> if (dsa_port_host_address_match(dp, info->dp)) {
>> err = dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid,
>> - info->db);
>> + false, info->db);
>
> drop
>
>> if (err)
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_fdb_add(struct dsa_switch
>> *ds,
>> if (!ds->ops->port_fdb_add)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> - return dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid, info->db);
>> + return dsa_port_do_fdb_add(dp, info->addr, info->vid,
>> info->is_locked, info->db);
>
> drop
>
>> }
>>
>> static int dsa_switch_fdb_del(struct dsa_switch *ds,
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
Hi Vladimir and Ido,
I can either ignore locked entries early or late in the dsa/switchdev
layers.
If I ignore early, I think it should be in br_switchdev_fdb_notify() in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c.
If I ignore late, I would think that it should be jut before sending it
to the driver(s), e.g. in dsa_port_do_fdb_add() in net/dsa/switch.c.
There is of course pros and cons of both options, but if the flag is
never to be sent to the driver, then it should be ignored early.
If ignored late most of this patch should not be dropped.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 15:29 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/6] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to extend locked port feature Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-10 8:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-10 8:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/6] net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-08 8:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 8:54 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-02 8:27 ` netdev
2022-08-02 8:27 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-02 10:13 ` netdev [this message]
2022-08-02 10:13 ` netdev
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-08 7:12 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-08 8:49 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 8:49 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 9:06 ` netdev
2022-07-08 9:06 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-08 9:15 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 9:15 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 9:27 ` netdev
2022-07-08 9:27 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-08 9:50 ` netdev
2022-07-08 9:50 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-08 11:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 11:56 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 12:34 ` netdev
2022-07-08 12:34 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-10 8:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-10 8:35 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-13 7:09 ` netdev
2022-07-13 7:09 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-13 12:39 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-13 12:39 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-17 12:21 ` netdev
2022-07-17 12:21 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-17 12:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 12:57 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 13:09 ` netdev
2022-07-17 13:09 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-17 13:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 13:59 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 14:57 ` netdev
2022-07-17 14:57 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-17 15:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 15:08 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 16:10 ` netdev
2022-07-17 16:10 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-21 11:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 11:54 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 15:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-17 15:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-17 15:53 ` netdev
2022-07-17 15:53 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-21 11:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 11:59 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 13:27 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-21 13:27 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-21 14:20 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 14:20 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-24 11:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 11:10 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-01 11:57 ` netdev
2022-08-01 11:57 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-01 13:14 ` netdev
2022-08-01 13:14 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-02 12:54 ` netdev
2022-08-02 12:54 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-01 15:33 ` netdev
2022-08-01 15:33 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-09 9:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-09 9:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-09 20:00 ` netdev
2022-08-09 20:00 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-10 7:21 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-10 7:21 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-10 8:40 ` netdev
2022-08-10 8:40 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-11 11:28 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-11 11:28 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-12 15:33 ` netdev
2022-08-12 15:33 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-16 7:51 ` netdev
2022-08-16 7:51 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-17 6:21 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-17 6:21 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-21 11:51 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 11:51 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-08 20:39 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allow reading FID when handling ATU violations Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB implementation Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-08 9:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-17 0:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 0:47 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-17 12:34 ` netdev
2022-07-17 12:34 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-21 12:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-21 12:04 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-19 8:28 ` netdev
2022-08-19 8:28 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests Hans Schultz
2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2022-07-10 7:29 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-10 7:29 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-07-12 12:28 ` netdev
2022-07-12 12:28 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-07-08 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/6] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-08 1:00 ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-11 5:09 ` Benjamin Poirier
2022-08-11 5:09 ` [Bridge] " Benjamin Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d884212b8df03e5cf03c4b2e5ea3e3d@kapio-technology.com \
--to=netdev@kapio-technology.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.