From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> To: netdev@kapio-technology.com Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:35:36 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YsqPWK67U0+Iw2Ru@shredder> (raw) In-Reply-To: <723e2995314b41ff323272536ef27341@kapio-technology.com> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:34:25PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote: > On 2022-07-08 13:56, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:50:33AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com > > wrote: > > > On 2022-07-08 11:15, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > > When the possibility for it to be true will exist, _all_ switchdev > > > > drivers will need to be updated to ignore that (mlxsw, cpss, ocelot, > > > > rocker, prestera, etc etc), not just DSA. And you don't need to > > > > propagate the is_locked flag to all individual DSA sub-drivers when none > > > > care about is_locked in the ADD_TO_DEVICE direction, you can just ignore > > > > within DSA until needed otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe I have it wrong, but I think that Ido requested me to send it > > > to all > > > the drivers, and have them ignore entries with is_locked=true ... > > > > I don't think Ido requested you to ignore is_locked from all DSA > > drivers, but instead from all switchdev drivers maybe. Quite different. > > So without changing the signature on port_fdb_add(). If that is to avoid > changing that signature, which needs to be changed anyhow for any switchcore > driver to act on it, then my next patch set will change the signarure also > as it is needed for creating dynamic ATU entries from userspace, which is > needed to make the whole thing complete. > > As it is already done (with the is_locked to the drivers) and needed for > future application, I would like Ido to comment on it before I take action. It's related to my reply here [1]. AFAICT, we have two classes of device drivers: 1. Drivers like mv88e6xxx that report locked entries to the bridge driver via 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE'. 2. Drivers like mlxsw that trap packets that incurred an FDB miss to the bridge driver. These packets will cause the bridge driver to emit 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE' notifications with the locked flag. If we can agree that locked entries are only meant to signal to user space that a certain MAC tried to gain authorization and that the bridge should ignore them while forwarding, then there is no point in generating the 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE' notifications. We should teach the bridge driver to suppress these so that there is no need to patch all the device drivers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YsqLyxTRtUjzDj6D@shredder/ > > > > > In any case I'm going to take a look at this patch set more closely and > > run the selftest on my Marvell switch, but I can't do this today > > unfortunately. I'll return with more comments. > > Yes :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> To: netdev@kapio-technology.com Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>, kuba@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:35:36 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YsqPWK67U0+Iw2Ru@shredder> (raw) In-Reply-To: <723e2995314b41ff323272536ef27341@kapio-technology.com> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:34:25PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote: > On 2022-07-08 13:56, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:50:33AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com > > wrote: > > > On 2022-07-08 11:15, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > > When the possibility for it to be true will exist, _all_ switchdev > > > > drivers will need to be updated to ignore that (mlxsw, cpss, ocelot, > > > > rocker, prestera, etc etc), not just DSA. And you don't need to > > > > propagate the is_locked flag to all individual DSA sub-drivers when none > > > > care about is_locked in the ADD_TO_DEVICE direction, you can just ignore > > > > within DSA until needed otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe I have it wrong, but I think that Ido requested me to send it > > > to all > > > the drivers, and have them ignore entries with is_locked=true ... > > > > I don't think Ido requested you to ignore is_locked from all DSA > > drivers, but instead from all switchdev drivers maybe. Quite different. > > So without changing the signature on port_fdb_add(). If that is to avoid > changing that signature, which needs to be changed anyhow for any switchcore > driver to act on it, then my next patch set will change the signarure also > as it is needed for creating dynamic ATU entries from userspace, which is > needed to make the whole thing complete. > > As it is already done (with the is_locked to the drivers) and needed for > future application, I would like Ido to comment on it before I take action. It's related to my reply here [1]. AFAICT, we have two classes of device drivers: 1. Drivers like mv88e6xxx that report locked entries to the bridge driver via 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE'. 2. Drivers like mlxsw that trap packets that incurred an FDB miss to the bridge driver. These packets will cause the bridge driver to emit 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE' notifications with the locked flag. If we can agree that locked entries are only meant to signal to user space that a certain MAC tried to gain authorization and that the bridge should ignore them while forwarding, then there is no point in generating the 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE' notifications. We should teach the bridge driver to suppress these so that there is no need to patch all the device drivers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YsqLyxTRtUjzDj6D@shredder/ > > > > > In any case I'm going to take a look at this patch set more closely and > > run the selftest on my Marvell switch, but I can't do this today > > unfortunately. I'll return with more comments. > > Yes :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-10 8:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-07 15:29 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/6] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to extend locked port feature Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-10 8:20 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-10 8:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/6] net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-08 8:54 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 8:54 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-08-02 8:27 ` netdev 2022-08-02 8:27 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-02 10:13 ` netdev 2022-08-02 10:13 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-08 7:12 ` kernel test robot 2022-07-08 8:49 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 8:49 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 9:06 ` netdev 2022-07-08 9:06 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-08 9:15 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 9:15 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 9:27 ` netdev 2022-07-08 9:27 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-08 9:50 ` netdev 2022-07-08 9:50 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-08 11:56 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 11:56 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 12:34 ` netdev 2022-07-08 12:34 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-10 8:35 ` Ido Schimmel [this message] 2022-07-10 8:35 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-13 7:09 ` netdev 2022-07-13 7:09 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-13 12:39 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-13 12:39 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-17 12:21 ` netdev 2022-07-17 12:21 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-17 12:57 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 12:57 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 13:09 ` netdev 2022-07-17 13:09 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-17 13:59 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 13:59 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 14:57 ` netdev 2022-07-17 14:57 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-17 15:08 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 15:08 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 16:10 ` netdev 2022-07-17 16:10 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-21 11:54 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 11:54 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 15:20 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-17 15:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-17 15:53 ` netdev 2022-07-17 15:53 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-21 11:59 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 11:59 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 13:27 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-21 13:27 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-21 14:20 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 14:20 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-24 11:10 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-24 11:10 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-08-01 11:57 ` netdev 2022-08-01 11:57 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-01 13:14 ` netdev 2022-08-01 13:14 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-02 12:54 ` netdev 2022-08-02 12:54 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-01 15:33 ` netdev 2022-08-01 15:33 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-09 9:20 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-09 9:20 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-08-09 20:00 ` netdev 2022-08-09 20:00 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-10 7:21 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-10 7:21 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-08-10 8:40 ` netdev 2022-08-10 8:40 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-11 11:28 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-11 11:28 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-08-12 15:33 ` netdev 2022-08-12 15:33 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-16 7:51 ` netdev 2022-08-16 7:51 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-08-17 6:21 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-17 6:21 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-21 11:51 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 11:51 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-08 20:39 ` kernel test robot 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allow reading FID when handling ATU violations Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB implementation Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-08 9:46 ` kernel test robot 2022-07-17 0:47 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 0:47 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-17 12:34 ` netdev 2022-07-17 12:34 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-21 12:04 ` Vladimir Oltean 2022-07-21 12:04 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean 2022-08-19 8:28 ` netdev 2022-08-19 8:28 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests Hans Schultz 2022-07-07 15:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz 2022-07-10 7:29 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-07-10 7:29 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel 2022-07-12 12:28 ` netdev 2022-07-12 12:28 ` [Bridge] " netdev 2022-07-08 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/6] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Jakub Kicinski 2022-07-08 1:00 ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski 2022-08-11 5:09 ` Benjamin Poirier 2022-08-11 5:09 ` [Bridge] " Benjamin Poirier -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2022-08-12 12:29 [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers netdev 2022-08-14 14:55 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-19 9:51 ` netdev 2022-08-21 7:08 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-21 13:43 ` netdev 2022-08-22 5:40 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-22 7:49 ` netdev 2022-08-23 6:48 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-23 7:13 ` netdev 2022-08-23 7:24 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-23 7:37 ` netdev 2022-08-23 12:36 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-24 7:07 ` netdev 2022-08-23 11:41 ` netdev 2022-08-25 9:36 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-25 10:28 ` netdev 2022-08-25 15:14 ` netdev 2022-08-24 20:29 ` netdev 2022-08-25 9:23 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-25 10:27 ` netdev 2022-08-25 11:58 ` Ido Schimmel 2022-08-25 13:41 ` netdev
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YsqPWK67U0+Iw2Ru@shredder \ --to=idosch@nvidia.com \ --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \ --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=edumazet@google.com \ --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \ --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \ --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@kapio-technology.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \ --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \ --cc=razor@blackwall.org \ --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.