All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@solid-run.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9131 solidwan board
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 13:07:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5432ff8-33d1-4de7-9bbf-0c0ba51500bc@solid-run.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240414-cn9130-som-v3-4-350a67d44e0a@solid-run.com>

Am 14.04.24 um 14:58 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> Add description for the SolidRun CN9131 SolidWAN, based on CN9130 SoM
> with an extra communication  processor on the carrier board.
>
> This board differentiates itself from CN9130 Clearfog by providing
> additional SoC native network interfaces and pci buses:
> 2x 10Gbps SFP+
> 4x 1Gbps RJ45
> 1x miniPCI-E
> 1x m.2 b-key with sata, usb-2.0 and usb-3.0
> 1x m.2 m-key with pcie and usb-2.0
> 1x m.2 b-key with pcie, usb-2.0, usb-3.0 and 2x sim slots
> 1x mpcie with pcie only
> 2x type-a usb-2.0/3.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts | 653 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 654 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> index 019f2251d696..16f9d7156d9f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += ac5x-rd-carrier-cn9131.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += ac5-98dx35xx-rd.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9130-cf-base.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9130-cf-pro.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9131-cf-solidwan.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ba7dd55abfb4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> + *
> + * DTS for SolidRun CN9130 Clearfog Base.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> +
> +#include "cn9130.dtsi"
> +#include "cn9130-sr-som.dtsi"
> +
> +/*
> + * Instantiate the external CP115
> + */
> +
> +#define CP11X_NAME		cp1
> +#define CP11X_BASE		f4000000
> +#define CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_BASE(iface) (0xe2000000 + (iface * 0x1000000))
> +#define CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_SIZE(iface) 0xf00000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE0_BASE	f4600000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE1_BASE	f4620000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE2_BASE	f4640000
> +
> +#include "armada-cp115.dtsi"
> +
> +#undef CP11X_NAME
> +#undef CP11X_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_SIZE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE0_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE1_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE2_BASE
> +
This is not very pretty, but shared between all CN9313 designs.
CN9132 designs will even have two of these with different addresses.

Is this worth moving into a dtsi?

I see two options then:

1. introduce cn9131.dtsi (which includes cn9130.dtsi).

Boards then can simply include cn9131.dtsi and skip cn9130.dtsi

2. introduce a standalone cn9130-cp1.dtsi which only instantiates cp1,
and does not include cn9130.dtsi.

Boards should include everything they need, e.g.
cn9130.dtsi + cn9130-cp1.dtsi + cn9130-cp2.dtsi


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@solid-run.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9131 solidwan board
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 13:07:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5432ff8-33d1-4de7-9bbf-0c0ba51500bc@solid-run.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240414-cn9130-som-v3-4-350a67d44e0a@solid-run.com>

Am 14.04.24 um 14:58 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> Add description for the SolidRun CN9131 SolidWAN, based on CN9130 SoM
> with an extra communication  processor on the carrier board.
>
> This board differentiates itself from CN9130 Clearfog by providing
> additional SoC native network interfaces and pci buses:
> 2x 10Gbps SFP+
> 4x 1Gbps RJ45
> 1x miniPCI-E
> 1x m.2 b-key with sata, usb-2.0 and usb-3.0
> 1x m.2 m-key with pcie and usb-2.0
> 1x m.2 b-key with pcie, usb-2.0, usb-3.0 and 2x sim slots
> 1x mpcie with pcie only
> 2x type-a usb-2.0/3.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts | 653 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 654 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> index 019f2251d696..16f9d7156d9f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile
> @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += ac5x-rd-carrier-cn9131.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += ac5-98dx35xx-rd.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9130-cf-base.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9130-cf-pro.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += cn9131-cf-solidwan.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ba7dd55abfb4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/cn9131-cf-solidwan.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> + *
> + * DTS for SolidRun CN9130 Clearfog Base.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> +
> +#include "cn9130.dtsi"
> +#include "cn9130-sr-som.dtsi"
> +
> +/*
> + * Instantiate the external CP115
> + */
> +
> +#define CP11X_NAME		cp1
> +#define CP11X_BASE		f4000000
> +#define CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_BASE(iface) (0xe2000000 + (iface * 0x1000000))
> +#define CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_SIZE(iface) 0xf00000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE0_BASE	f4600000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE1_BASE	f4620000
> +#define CP11X_PCIE2_BASE	f4640000
> +
> +#include "armada-cp115.dtsi"
> +
> +#undef CP11X_NAME
> +#undef CP11X_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIEx_MEM_SIZE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE0_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE1_BASE
> +#undef CP11X_PCIE2_BASE
> +
This is not very pretty, but shared between all CN9313 designs.
CN9132 designs will even have two of these with different addresses.

Is this worth moving into a dtsi?

I see two options then:

1. introduce cn9131.dtsi (which includes cn9130.dtsi).

Boards then can simply include cn9131.dtsi and skip cn9130.dtsi

2. introduce a standalone cn9130-cp1.dtsi which only instantiates cp1,
and does not include cn9130.dtsi.

Boards should include everything they need, e.g.
cn9130.dtsi + cn9130-cp1.dtsi + cn9130-cp2.dtsi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-14 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-14 12:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9130 som and clearfog boards Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58 ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9130 som based boards Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-22 13:38   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-22 13:38     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-14 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132 CEX-7 evaluation board Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-22 13:38   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-22 13:38     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-14 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9130 som and clearfog boards Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:02   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:02     ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:30     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-14 13:30       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-22 13:38   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-22 13:38     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-14 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9131 solidwan board Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 12:58   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:07   ` Josua Mayer [this message]
2024-04-14 13:07     ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:18   ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-14 13:18     ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-22 13:37     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-22 13:37       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-22 13:47       ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-22 13:47         ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-26 18:18         ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-26 18:18           ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-26 18:51           ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-26 18:51             ` Josua Mayer
2024-04-26 19:43             ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-26 19:43               ` Andrew Lunn
2024-04-15 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun cn9130 som and clearfog boards Rob Herring
2024-04-15 18:47   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f5432ff8-33d1-4de7-9bbf-0c0ba51500bc@solid-run.com \
    --to=josua@solid-run.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=yazan.shhady@solid-run.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.